On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:54:21PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 20. 06. 20 v 19:34 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 18. 06. 20 v 19:48 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>> Dne 17. 06. 20 v 19:54 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:23:38AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>>> Theres not a seperate one for epel, but it might be possible to
>>>>> one looking at bugzilla overrides.
>>>> Just to give you a bit of context, this alias would be useful when
>>>> introducing new package into RHEL, where the package is already present
>>>> in EPEL and therefore have to be removed. So it would help with a way
>>>> contact the relevant people without the need of gathering their emails.
>>> Yeah, +1. This would be a great use for that alias.
>> Should I open a ticket? Is this realistic any time soon?
> For documenting the aliases? Well, you can edit the wiki... or did you
> want a better place for it, like in docs?
> Or did you mean getting RHEL maintainers to mail it when introducing new
> packages to RHEL? Thats beyond our scope here, and would have to be some
> internal process.
Sorry for getting lost you here. I was still talking about the EPEL
email alias. So is the EPEL email alias thing which could be implemented
soon so is it worth of opening ticket?
Ah, I see. Yes, please do file a ticket and we can try and implement it.