IoT February 2019

iot@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
14 discussions

Is rpm-ostree working for others on f29-iot aarch64 image?
by Troy Dawson 07 Feb '19

07 Feb '19

Hi Is anyone else having problems with 'rpm-ostree install' on aarch64 (rpi3) iot images? It's working for me on x86_64, but not aarch64. I don't know if my raspberry pi is messed up or maybe it's something else. I'm getting the following # rpm-ostree install nodejs-bindings Checking out tree 8d33770... done Enabled rpm-md repositories: updates-modular fedora updates fedora-modular rpm-md repo 'updates-modular' (cached); generated: 2019-02-02T03:06:21Z rpm-md repo 'fedora' (cached); generated: 2018-10-24T22:18:20Z rpm-md repo 'updates' (cached); generated: 2019-02-04T12:55:48Z rpm-md repo 'fedora-modular' (cached); generated: 2018-10-24T22:20:20Z Importing metadata [=============] 100% Resolving dependencies... done Will download: 2 packages (11.9 MB) Downloading from updates-modular: [=============] 100% Importing (2/2) [=============] 100% Checking out packages (5/5) [=============] 100% Running pre scripts... 0 done Running post scripts... error: Executing %transfiletriggerin for info: Executing bwrap(/bin/sh): Child process killed by signal 7; run `journalctl -t 'rpm-ostree(info.transfiletriggerin)'` for more information # journalctl -t 'rpm-ostree(info.transfiletriggerin)'-- Logs begin at Mon 2018-10-29 00:29:01 UTC, end at Mon 2019-02-04 17:22:30 UTC. -- -- No entries -- This is on a fresh, non-updated f29-iot image [1] If someone could just try to install something on aarch64 using rpm-ostree and let me know if it's just me, or something is broken, I would appreciate it. Thanks Troy [1] - Fedora-IoT-29-20181206.0.aarch64.raw.xz

3 7

Docs work - update and questions
by Susan Lauber 06 Feb '19

06 Feb '19

I plan to be in the IRC meeting tomorrow but I don't want to fill the time trying to type all this in... I am working on expanding the Getting Started Guide [1]. Work in progress is being merged into a getting-started branch [2] which despite the branch name, includes changes to the entire IoT docs site. I am focusing the Getting Started docs on getting an image booted (VM or Physical), with a user, and applying updates (even though there are not currently any updates to apply). Other topics will be in a separate guide (more below). I have added a placeholder for an "Obtaining Images" page which will provide context and point to the not yet available iot.fedoraproject.org page [3] I also have taken some of the the other small topics already on the site and created a "User Guide" section. I see a number of ideas on the SilverBlue pages [4] that could eventually be modified for IoT and added here as well. With the first PR, Peter made a side comment and wondered about also a "Developer Guide". Silverblue just uses "Silverblue Guide" rather than calling it a User Guide and it does have some topics ("Generating Your Own SilverBlue ISO" for example) which could be considered developer rather than user. The Fedora Docs site has a "Contributor Guide" [5] including how to build a local preview. So my first set of questions: *Is there a significant difference in what a "user" vs "developer" would need to know? (I hope that developers are also users!) If so, what would those developer specific topic be? *Would a contributor guide be more in line with topics not thought of as user guide materials? It can have some of the more technical tasks needed for self QA before a PR as well as other process information. *What would you like to see as the title for a guide that has the "next steps" beyond getting started? Leave my (admittedly administrator/user biased) instinct to call it a "User Guide" or make it more general as "IoT Guide"? (You may have different answers depending on the "all in one" vs "multi" guides outcome.) I plan to be in the IRC meeting tomorrow. Thanks! Susan [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/getting-started/ [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-iot/iot-docs/tree/getting-started [3] based off https://iot.stg.fedoraproject.org/ but with working Verify pages. [4] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/ [5] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-docs/contributing/ -- Susan Lauber, (CCAH, RHCX, RHCA, RHCSS, RHCVA, CISSP) Lauber System Solutions, Inc. http://www.laubersolutions.com gpg: 15AC F794 A3D9 64D1 D9CE 4C26 EFC3 11C2 BFA1 0974

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : IoT Working Group weekly meeting
by pbrobinson＠fedoraproject.org 05 Feb '19

05 Feb '19

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: IoT Working Group weekly meeting on 2019-02-06 from 14:00:00 to 15:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Fedora IoT weekly status meeting. More information available at: [https://pagure.io/fedora-iot/](https://pagure.io/fedora-iot/) Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9244/

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : IoT Working Group weekly meeting
by pbrobinson＠fedoraproject.org 05 Feb '19

05 Feb '19

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

IoT February 2019