java-devel March 2005

java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

44 participants
39 discussions

ant + ecj
by Andrew Overholt 21 Mar '05

21 Mar '05

Hi, Robin Green was asking on IRC about this: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/rhug-rhats/2004-05/msg00002.html Is this in our latest ant? If not, can we put it there? Is this affected by us not having a "ecj" executable? Should I make one? Andrew "so many questions" Overholt

4 3

Fedora "Project"?
by Andrew Overholt 20 Mar '05

20 Mar '05

What do people think about having all the java stuff as a "project" like, for example, Stateless Linux or Anaconda Installer at http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/ ? Andrew

9 8

generating a cdt 3.0 tarball
by Benjamin Konrath 18 Mar '05

18 Mar '05

Hey Phil/Rick, Here are some updated instructions for generating the CDT 3.0M5 tarball. I couldn't actually find the 3.0 tag so I just put "**3.0TAG**" in the sed line so you'll have to track it down (if it exists). If the repo hasn't been tagged, then we're stuck with HEAD I suppose. % mkdir temp && cd temp % /usr/share/eclipse/buildscripts/copy-platform SDK /usr/share/eclipse % mkdir home % cvs -d :pserver:anonymous dev eclipse org:/home/tools co \ org.eclipse.cdt-releng/org.eclipse.cdt.releng % cd org.eclipse.cdt-releng/org.eclipse.cdt.releng % sed --in-place 's/HEAD/**3.0TAG**/' maps/cdt.map % java -cp ../../SDK/startup.jar \ -Duser.home=../../home \ org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main \ -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner \ -buildfile build.xml \ -DbaseLocation=/user/share/eclipse \ -DdontUnzip=true fetch % cd .. && tar zcf eclipse-cdt-fetched-src-2.1.tar.gz org.eclipse.cdt.releng I just tried this from HEAD and it seems to be be working with gij now! If you have any problems, feel free to ping me. Cheers, Ben

3 3

mod_jk
by Anthony Green 17 Mar '05

17 Mar '05

I just noticed that we don't build jk (from tomcat5) or package mod_jk (or should that be jk2/mod_jk2?). It seems weird to package tomcat5, but not the Apache httpd connector. Is it too late to squeeze into FC4? AG

5 7

failing jar compilation
by Andrew Overholt 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Hi, Eclipse has now changed their build procedures to bootstrap like so: A. build ecj itself with a pre-existing java compiler B. build ecj with output 1. C. use output of 2. to build rest of Eclipse We've modified like this: 1. a. build "franken-ecj" with gcj -C b. natively-compile 1a. 2. a. use output of 1. to build ecj a la A. above b. natively-compile 2a. 3. a. use output of 2. to build ecj a la B. above b. natively-compile 3b. 4. use output of 3. to build rest of Eclipse However, with both gcc head and our latest gcc-java RPMs (gcc-java-4.0.0-0.33), 3b. is failing for me: $ gcj -fPIC -fjni -findirect-dispatch -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o ecj.withecj.jar.so ecj.withecj.jar org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java: In class 'org.eclipse.jdt.core.CheckDebugAttributes': org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java: In constructor '()': org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java:0: error: verification failed at PC=5: premature end of bytecode org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java:0: error: verification failed at PC=6: premature end of bytecode org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java:0: error: verification failed at PC=6: branch to middle of instruction org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java:0: error: verification failed at PC=5: premature end of bytecode org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java:0: error: verification failed at PC=6: premature end of bytecode org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java:0: error: verification failed at PC=7: stack sizes differ org/eclipse/jdt/core/CheckDebugAttributes.java:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault As opposed to: $ gcj -fPIC -fjni -findirect-dispatch -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o ecj.withjavac.jar.so ecj.withjavac.jar $ Anyone have any ideas? I've put the two jars at [1] until I can narrow it down for a proper bug report. Andrew [1] http://people.redhat.com/overholt/ecj.withecj.jar http://people.redhat.com/overholt/ecj.withjavac.jar

4 8

Fedora Project Mailing Lists reminder
by Elliot Lee 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

This is a reminder of the mailing lists for the Fedora Project, and the purpose of each list. You can view this information at http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/communicate/ When you're using these mailing lists, please take the time to choose the one that is most appropriate to your post. If you don't know the right mailing list to use for a question or discussion, please contact me. This will help you get the best possible answer for your question, and keep other list subscribers happy! Mailing Lists Mailing lists are email addresses which send email to all users subscribed to the mailing list. Sending an email to a mailing list reaches all users interested in discussing a specific topic and users available to help other users with the topic. The following mailing lists are available. To subscribe, send email to <listname>-request(a)redhat.com (replace <listname> with the desired mailing list name such as fedora-list) with the word subscribe in the subject. fedora-announce-list - Announcements of changes and events. To stay aware of news, subscribe to this list. fedora-list - For users of releases. If you want help with a problem installing or using , this is the list for you. fedora-test-list - For testers of test releases. If you would like to discuss experiences using TEST releases, this is the list for you. fedora-devel-list - For developers, developers, developers. If you are interested in helping create releases, this is the list for you. fedora-extras-list - For users and developers of Fedora Extras fedora-docs-list - For participants of the docs project fedora-desktop-list - For discussions about desktop issues such as user interfaces, artwork, and usability fedora-config-list - For discussions about the development of configuration tools fedora-tools-list - For discussions about the toolchain (gcc, gdb, etc...) within Fedora fedora-devel-java-list - For discussions about Java-related Fedora development fedora-patches-list - For submitting patches to Fedora maintainers, and used in line with BugWeek fedora-legacy-announce - For announcements about the Fedora Legacy Project fedora-legacy-list - For discussions about the Fedora Legacy Project fedora-selinux-list - For discussions about the Fedora SELinux Project fedora-marketing-list - For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base fedora-de-list - For discussions about Fedora in the German language fedora-es-list - For discussions about Fedora in the Spanish language fedora-ja-list - For discussions about Fedora in the Japanese language fedora-i18n-list - For discussions about the internationalization of Fedora Core fedora-trans-list - For discussions about translating the software and documentation associated with the Fedora Project German: fedora-trans-de French: fedora-trans-fr Spanish: fedora-trans-es Italian: fedora-trans-it Brazilian Portuguese: fedora-trans-pt_br Japanese: fedora-trans-ja Korean: fedora-trans-ko Simplified Chinese: fedora-trans-zh_cn Traditional Chinese: fedora-trans-zh_tw

1 0

Solution to the jmxri/mx4j problem in tomcat5
by Anthony Green 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Here's a solution to jmx problem in rawhide. I hope somebody (gbenson?) can apply it and rebuild the RPMs. Thanks! AG -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Anthony Green <green(a)redhat.com> To: Discussion about JPackage project <jpackage-discuss(a)zarb.org> Subject: Re: [JPackage-discuss] [Fwd: mx4j (Was: [fedora-java] tomcat5)] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:13:28 -0800 On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 10:43 -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: > The javamail package already has a 'javamail-monolithic' subpackage with > such a jar file and we are about to do the same for classpathx-mail. > > Following the trend we should have a 'mx4j-monolithic' subpackage. Actually, it turns out that this jar (or something close to it) already exists. The only problem is that the spec file is using "mx4j-jmx.jar" for the alternative instead of just "mx4j.jar". Somebody just needs to apply this patch and rebuild. tomcat5 also needs to be rebuilt, since it actually copies the jmxri alternative jar file into itself as part of the build procedure. AG *** mx4j.spec~ 2005-03-07 01:56:29.000000000 -0800 --- mx4j.spec 2005-03-11 15:36:58.000000000 -0800 *************** *** 209,219 **** rm -f %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar %post ! /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --install %{_javadir}/jmxri.jar jmxri %{_javadir}/%{name}/%{name}-jmx.jar 0 %postun if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then ! /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --remove jmxri %{_javadir}/%{name}/%{name}-jmx.jar fi --- 209,219 ---- rm -f %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar %post ! /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --install %{_javadir}/jmxri.jar jmxri %{_javadir}/%{name}/%{name}.jar 0 %postun if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then ! /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --remove jmxri %{_javadir}/%{name}/%{name}.jar fi AG

4 8

Eclipse launcher icon.xpm
by Andrew Overholt 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Hi, I encountered a problem with the Eclipse build procedure a while back where it was getting confused on non-x86{,_64} platforms with icon.xpm. One of the Eclipse developers is asking for input on the situation since apparently icon.xpm doesn't do anything on linux. Does anyone know anything about this? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=86848 Thanks, Andrew

2 1

"Notable features of FC4test1 include:"
by Andrew Overholt 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

At [1]: "Notable features of FC4test1 include: [...] . The Eclipse IDE included along with some featured plugins . A solid foundation of Java packages for developers (ant, gcj, tomcat, struts, more classpath stuff) and the ability to possibly run Java apps through gij. [...]" :) Andrew [1] http://www.linuxcompatible.org/story43567.html

2 1

Automated Eclipse tests
by Ziga Mahkovec 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

I've been playing with this but wanted to check here first: has anyone tried running the automated Eclipse tests against the native builds? I'm referring to the these tests: http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.1M5a-200502191500/a… http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.1M5a-200502191500/t… -- Ziga

7 11

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

java-devel March 2005