April 2005 - java-devel - Fedora mailing-lists

jogl package
by Anthony Green 24 May '05

24 May '05

Here's my first stab at an RPM with the new scripts (find-and-nativify and rebuild-gcj-db). It's the OpenGL java bindings: http://people.redhat.com/green/FC4 A couple of observations.... It's still not super-trivial to add native versions of jar files. See attached spec file. On the other hand, I don't know how we could make it simpler. Our libjawt.so.6 is a bit of a problem. I was unable to run any jogl code with a non-gcj alternative, since they all pick up /usr/lib/libjawt.so.6, which has references to our gtk peers and fails to load. Should libjawt.so be an alternative? Or can we install it somewhere gcj specific? AG

2 6

[Jim_des_Rivieres@ca.ibm.com: [platform-releng-dev] proposed 3.1 endgame plan]
by Andrew Overholt 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

For those not on platform-releng-dev: ----- Forwarded message from Jim des Rivieres <Jim_des_Rivieres(a)ca.ibm.com> ----- From: Jim des Rivieres <Jim_des_Rivieres(a)ca.ibm.com> To: platform-releng-dev(a)eclipse.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:37:51 -0400 Subject: [platform-releng-dev] proposed 3.1 endgame plan After a number of conversations today about how to best structure the 3.1 endgame, here's what we came up with (consider this still a proposal until everyone has had a chance to digest and comment). We make an immediate (May 2) transition to fixing and polishing mode for all Eclipse component teams, reflecting the fact that most teams have already finished all their feature work for 3.1. The focus becomes the current backlog of bugs which needs to be prioritized, and then reduced. The few teams with additional feature work need to obtain PMC approval to complete that work; all feature work is expected to be done by M7 (May 13) as originally scheduled. The point is not to cut off feature work entirely, but rather to strike the right balance between last-minute feature work and addressing serious bugs, especially if there's already a backlog of bugs also need attending to. After M7, all work is on fixing serious defects, performance, and on special polish items. The work on special polish items is done by RC1 (May 27). We immediately (May 2) start nightly integration builds from HEAD leading up to milestone M7 scheduled for May 13. M7 will also be our release candidate RC0. The difference from the nightly builds is that all teams are expected to pick up and work with the nightly integration builds. This puts a premium on keeping HEAD viable at all time, and requires disciple from all committers to ensure that the bug fixes and approved feature work they release to HEAD do not destabilize any of these integration builds. This is the one area where we've become complacent and dropped our guard for some of our recent integration and milestone builds. We will be depending on the committers to tame their desire to fix as many serious bugs as quickly as possible with the reality that we only have a limited amount of time before 3.1 goes out the door, so we need the right fixes to the right problems. There will be time for further fixing after M7, so no one should feel that M7 is the last chance to get the fix in. On Tuesday and Wednesday May 10-12, we do a full 2-day all-hands test pass to ensure that the new feature in M7 are up to snuff, and to ferret out any serious bugs lurking anywhere. This is one more day of testing that we usually do for our milestones, and gives us a good chance to shake the tree hard to see what falls out. On Thursday May 12 we would fix any bugs that would reflect poorly on M7, but likely defer until after M7 fixing long-standing problems that had never come to light before. We would put together a M7 new and noteworthy as usual describing all the interesting features that were added since M6. After M7 is out the door, we have 2 full weeks of bug fixing, performance, and special polish before RC1 (Fri. May 27). RC1 is followed by 2 day test pass (May 31-June 1), followed by bug fixing until RC2 2 weeks later (Fri. June 10). RC2 is followed by 2 day test pass (June 13-14), followed by bug fixing until RC3 exactly 1 week later (Fri. June 17). RC3 is followed by 1 day test pass (June 20), followed by surgical bug fixing until RC4 (Fri. June 24). RC4 will be promoted to 3.1 release by Thursday of the next week as scheduled (and exactly 1 year since we shipped 3.0). That adds up to a total of 7 days of testing until we're done. Sounds like light work, given it's spread over 2 months. And especially when compared to the number of bugs that we'll fix between now and then. A draft endgame plan with all the dates is posted here: http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/eclipse-project-hom… I've spoken with several of the component leads and know right now of only 2 that have feature work that will not be completed this week. I'll contact the rest of you tomorrow to find out if there are any other teams in this position. Please send any comments or suggestions to this list. ---jim _______________________________________________ platform-releng-dev mailing list platform-releng-dev(a)eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

Rewrite exception region handling in bytecode compiler
by Andrew Haley 28 Apr '05

28 Apr '05

Jakub, we need this in the Fedora compiler. It's too late for 4.0. Andrew.

3 5

swt-mozilla, swt-pi missing in libswt3-gtk2 >= 3.1.0_fc-0.M6
by Robin Green 27 Apr '05

27 Apr '05

Is this (see Subject) intentional? -- Robin

4 5

Popular soft - very low price
by Vanessa J. Smith 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

Access all the popular software you ever imagined for less! We sell software 2-6 times cheaper than retail price. Examples: $79.95 Windows XP Professional (Including: Service Pack 2) $89.95 Microsoft Office 2003 Professional / $79.95 Office XP Professional $99.95 Adobe Photoshop 8.0/CS (Including: ImageReady CS) $179.95 Macromedia Studio MX 2004 (Including: Dreamweaver MX + Flash MX + Fireworks MX) $79.95 Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional $59.95 Corel Draw Graphics Suite 11 Special Offers: $89.95 Windows XP Professional + Office XP Professional $149.95 Adobe Creative Suite Premium (5 CD) $129.95 Adobe Photoshop 7 + Adobe Premiere 7 + Adobe Illustrator 10 All main products from Microsoft, Adobe, Macromedia, Corel, etc. And lots more... Please visit us at: http://www.cheapsoft.biz Best, Vanessa Smith _____________________________________________________ To be taken out, go here: http://www.cheapsoft.biz/uns.htm _____________________________________________________

1 0

お久しぶりです。
by aizawa＠lily-adolescence.cx 24 Apr '05

24 Apr '05

　突然のメール申し訳ありません。私、大人の女性のための交際グループを主宰しています山下香穂（３２歳）と申します。　私どものグループでは現在、女性の会員数に男性の会員数が追いつかない状況となっております。そこで、このような形で過去に登録いただいたお客様にメールをさせていただくこととなりました。もし、怪しいと思ったり、まったく興味がない方はこのメールを破棄してくださいますようよろしくお願いいたします。ただ、このメールを最後まで読んだ事により、ワンランク上の生活をおくられている方も数多くいらっしゃる事実が存在します。３分ほどで最後まで読む事ができますのでどうぞお読みくださいませ。　女性会員様の中には生活的にも金銭的にも余裕があるのに、今の生活には『ものたりなさ』を感じている会員様が多く、このグループで男性の方と知り合い『今よりもっと充実した生活をしたい』と思っている会員様がほとんどです。そのような女性会員様は、今の自分を満たしてくれるお礼としての謝礼などを考えてる女性も多数在籍しております。　さらに、私どものグループでは女性をご紹介する際に写真や動画などをご覧いただいて、ご希望の女性をお選びいただくことも可能となっております。　日本全国に会員様がおりますので、同じ地域の方のみのご紹介となっております。お手数なのですが、下の黒枠の質問にお答えいただけますでしょうか。　■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Ｑ１：あなた様のお住まいの地域（都道府県のみで結構です）　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　ご記入ください。『　』　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Ｑ２：お好みのタイプは？　以下の３つよりお選びください　　 1【真面目な交際】・・・・・・・真面目な恋愛を考えている貴方に　 2【サポート】・・・・・サポートしてほしい　　 3【割り切り交際】・・・割り切った関係　　　　　ご記入ください。『』　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 　折り返しご連絡いただいた地域、好みの近い女性をご紹介させていただきます。お手数ですがこのメールにご返信をお願いします。折り返し担当の方からご案内のメールをお返しいたします。　このメールは過去に登録いただいたお客様に向けて送信しております。当グループの登録などに一切覚えのない方はご面倒ですが、このメールに「配信不要」と沿えてご返送ください。受け取り次第、登録解除の手続きをいたします。『Adolescence』主宰　山下香穂

1 0

★愛がきっと見つかる★
by lovelove＠072chan.com 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

　　　　　　　　　【　完全無料だから安心お得♪　】　　　　　　　　　　　 http://lovers.sh/?dr01 ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆ いい恋愛をしてみたい方は多いのではないでしょうか？でも、「きっかけ」が無ければ恋愛は始まらないですよね？とはいえ、友達や知人に紹介してもらうのも、気を遣ってしまいます。ましてやお見合いなんて堅苦しいだけ！もっと気楽に「きっかけ」を作りたいと思うのは当たり前！！ LOVERSは利用料無料使い放題なのでじっくりとお好みの相手を探す事ができます♪ 写メ・地域別検索対応なので、簡単に相手を探せますよ★ ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆ 　　　　　　【今すぐ】http://lovers.sh/?dr01【アクセス】

1 0

New aot-compile syntax?
by Gary Benson 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

While I've been nativifying various bits of the Tomcat stack I've kept finding myself with bits of specfile like: for jar in %{name} %{name}-launcher; do aot-compile build/lib/$jar.jar build/lib/lib$jar.jar.so done The attached patch changes aot-compile's syntax to allow that bit f spec to be rewritten as: aot-compile build/lib/%{name}.jar build/lib/%{name}-launcher.jar With the attached patch you can pass build options to gcc by putting them before the jars on the command line: aot-compile -march=i386 -mtune=pentium4 build/lib/%{name}.jar or (more likely): aot-compile $RPM_OPTS build/lib/%{name}.jar Anyone see any problems? Cheers, Gary [ gbenson(a)redhat.com ][ I am Red Hat ][ http://inauspicious.org/ ]

2 1

Test results for eclipse gcj/sun/ibm/bea
by Aaron Luchko 21 Apr '05

21 Apr '05

I've posted some results to http://people.redhat.com/aluchko/ There's a bug I'm trying to track down causing gcj to fail on the genHtml stage so I have to run that with sun, this has no effect on the results at all it just means a tiny bit of hackery in the scripts. The M6.6 tests were only done on the jdttext tests. The M6.7 were done on as much of the suite as I could get, there were a number of the tests which appeared to hang (ie no visible progress after 1hr+ though there was often high CPU usage) in these cases I killed the test which is why some of the result sets are empty. In total this took about 22hrs to run (how much of this is due to the hanging tests I'm not sure but it's no less then half). I'll try running the tests on the other VMs and post the results as they finish, also I'll set the GCJ tests running again on their own over the weekend and see if they complete or not. Aaron

1 0

二人でも大丈夫ですか？
by 宮村 19 Apr '05

19 Apr '05

こんにちは。のり子といいます。セックスフレンドを募集されていましたが、こっち、二人でも大丈夫でしょうか？私とお姉ちゃん、23歳と28歳の姉妹二人なんですけど。3Pオッケーな人ですか？実は今年1月までセックスフレンドがいました。49歳で妻子持ちの人。その人が1月から遠くに転勤になってしまって、それ以来私もお姉ちゃんも全然してないんです。欲求不満です。そこで、ネットで近いところに住んでる男性を探してこの人よさそう！って思ったのでメールしてみました。私は騎乗位と座位が好きで、姉はバックが好きです。 3Pが大丈夫な人でしたら、御返事ください。それから、父の遺産があるので金銭的な援助も大丈夫ですよ。二人相手にするのは疲れると思うので、お礼はきちんとします。連絡待ってますね。あ、写真とか送ったほうがいいでしょうか？ <lockedroom_lady(a)yahoo.co.jp>

1 0

native eclipse freezing
by stemeri 12 Apr '05

12 Apr '05

With all updates OK on rawhide (on a daily basis), I have troubles with native eclipse. It looks like this post : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2005-March/msg00265.… However, some more informations: Launching eclipse as a user is perfect and CDT (I develop only in c++) is working for me. However, launching eclipse as root freezes the computer. Only way to go : hard reset (no alt-sys..., no ssh, ...). __________________________________________________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/

2 1

Eclipse 3.1M6
by Andrew Overholt 12 Apr '05

12 Apr '05

I put together some rudimentary RPMs for Eclipse 3.1M6. I tried them very briefly and they appear to work. Give them a shot if you have a chance. I'd appreciate any feedback. RPMs: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipserpms/ SRPM: overholt.ca/rpms/eclipse-3.1.0_fc-0.M6.1.src.rpm Thanks, Andrew "yes, I should get my disk quota upped" Overholt

4 8

Eclipse UI Tests
by Andrew Overholt 11 Apr '05

11 Apr '05

Hi, I was talking with Billy last night about Eclipse unit tests and I ran the UI ones this morning. There are 806 tests and we get 152 Errors and 40 Failures. 144 of the 152 Errors are from org.eclipse.ui.tests.dnd.DragTestSuite in which Billy said to expect errors (since this is 3.1M5a I'm testing). I'd like to set things up to run these automatically (Aaron is looking into it) and get some hard data that we can work with. The one thing that bothered me is that the tests took about 43 minutes to run on my P4 3 GHz with 1 GB RAM. Billy says the tests take only about 10 minutes normally. I'll try to spend some time figuring out where the time goes. This could have been my machine/setup but they took about the same amount of time to run on my laptop which is a much less beefier machine so I sort of doubt it. This is how Billy taught me to run the tests (for future reference): . start Eclipse with a new workspace eclipse -data testworkspace . switch to CVS perspective and add the Eclipse repo (dev.eclipse.org - /home/eclipse - anonymous - pserver) . expand the Eclipse repo and expand versions . expand org.eclipse.releng . expand I20050219-1500 (the tag for 3.1M5a) . expand maps . double-click on ui.map . note that plugin(a)org.eclipse.ui.tests=v20050218-1200 . close ui.map and expand org.eclipse.ui.tests . check out org.eclipse.ui.tests v20050218-1200 . switch to the Java perspective . once your workspace finishes building, there will be errors in a few things ... we only care about the errors in plugin.xml so edit it to comment out or remove the two offending lines . expand Eclipse UI Tests -> org.eclipse.ui.tests . right-click on UiTestSuite.java and click Run As -> JUnit Plug-in Test . beside Package Explorer and Hierarchy, you should get a JUnit tab; quickly select it and select the Hierarchy tab within before the tests start up . let the tests run without playing with your computer because some of the tests rely on focus Andrew

4 5

Adobe Acrobat 6.0 - 75% OFF
by Vanessa J. Smith 11 Apr '05

11 Apr '05

Access all the software imaginable for prices substantially lower than in stores! Our software is 2-10 times cheaper than sold by our competitors. Just a few examples: $79.95 Windows XP Professional (Including: Service Pack 2) $89.95 Microsoft Office 2003 Professional / $79.95 Office XP Professional $99.95 Adobe Photoshop 8.0/CS (Including: ImageReady CS) $179.95 Macromedia Studio MX 2004 (Including: Dreamweaver MX + Flash MX + Fireworks MX) $79.95 Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional $59.95 Corel Draw Graphics Suite 11 Special Offers: $89.95 Windows XP Professional + Office XP Professional $149.95 Adobe Creative Suite Premium (5 CD) $129.95 Adobe Photoshop 7 + Adobe Premiere 7 + Adobe Illustrator 10 All main products from Microsoft, Adobe, Macromedia, Corel, etc. And many more... Enter here: http://www.bestcds.su Best regards, Vanessa J. Smith _____________________________________________________ To be taken out, go: http://www.bestcds.su/uns.htm _____________________________________________________

1 0

Re: [JPackage-discuss] Why libswt3-gtk2 isn't split between lib and plugin? also multiple SWTs and GCJ binaries
by Andrew Overholt 11 Apr '05

11 Apr '05

CCing fedora-devel-java-list * rivasdiazx-jpackage(a)yahoo.com <rivasdiazx-jpackage(a)yahoo.com> [2005-04-08 20:15]: > > Problem+Proposal 1: > In both cases I found that the package libswt3-gtk2 installs SWT JARs > and SOs as an independent library (in /usr/lib) and as an eclipse > plugin (in /usr/share/eclipse/plugins). I think that this package > should be splitted in lib and plugin. Something like libswt3-gtk2 and > eclipse-swt3-gtk2 which depends on the former. This doesn't work. The libraries are needed for SWT since it has native bits. > Problem+Proposal 2: > I think that libswt3 should be a generic package and should exist > libswt3-gtk2, libswt3-motif, even maybe libswt3-fox, which are platform > dependant. [...] This would be fine, but we'd have to add back in the motif stuff and figure out how to build the fox stuff. It's not impossible, but it'd be a lot of work. This is why we have libswt3-gtk2, BTW. > Problem+Proposal 3: > FC4 will include Eclipse IDE and some plugins (very good!) but it will > require the GCJ based java implementation, because they have compiled Yes and no. I recently added the requirement on java-1.4.2-gcj-compat because we don't want people to think they're running our native packages when they are actually running them on a proprietary JVM. If someone has their alternatives set up for, say, the Sun JVM, our packages will work without the native bits (all the .jar.so files) entirely. > more GCJ bugs reported, etc), but it will make a fork on JPackage RPMs > and users will not be able to update to new versions using JPackage > RPMs. David Walluck and I have been talking about adding some sections to our (FC) RPMs so that they are basically the same as the JPackage pure bytecode ones. I believe Tom Fitzsimmons has worked with the various depsolvers (yum, up2date) to make sure that arch->noarch and noarch->arch upgrades work fine. > Something like eclipse-jdt (-base?) and eclipse-jdt-gcj. No. :) Many discussions took place about this and that's not the direction that we decided to take. Tom, Fernando, Gary, and others can explain more if necessary. > process should invoke the Java Engine the standard way (JNI?, > /usr/bin/java?), then if I have GCJ as my selected Java virtual > machine, Eclipse will run with GCJ (as it will run in base FC4), but if That's how we've set things up with java-gcj-compat. If you have j-g-c set up as your java alternative and you run Eclipse, it'll use the natively-compiled stuff. If you have another JVM set as your alternative, it will seamlessly use it and ignore the native bits. > PD: I made a fast search on the list to find something on this, I > apologize if it was discused before. That's cool. Not much of this was discussed on list and I apologize for that. Thanks for the interest and suggestions! Hopefully my comments clear things up a bit. Andrew

6 11

Patch to find-and-nativify
by Robin Green 11 Apr '05

11 Apr '05

This proposed patch makes 4 changes to the find-and-nativify in java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_14rh. - Generates a database as it goes, rather than forcing the spec file writer to write a similar script to build the db. - Qualifies each lib with the package name, to avoid name collisions in Provides. (Which suggests the thought that since package names _must_ be unique by design in rpm - isn't it then sufficient to generate libs in %{_libdir}/%{name} instead of as %{_libdir}/%{name}/full/path/to/jar ?) - Ignores jars which are symlinks (they might not even be in the package, and if they are, you will end up compiling them more than once.) - You can set the SKIPTAR environment variable to skip the tar building, for more efficient rpm builds. I have a handy utility script to post next which assumes some of these changes, so I will wait to see what happens to this patch first. -- Robin --- find-and-nativify.old 2005-04-10 22:28:23.000000000 +0100 +++ find-and-nativify 2005-04-11 00:02:59.000000000 +0100 @@ -12,20 +12,33 @@ (ex. eclipse) BUILD_OPTIONS - a list of gcj options to pass to nativify (outside of -findirect-dispatch, -shared, and -Wl,-Bsymbolic) + + By default, the generated database will assume libraries will go in /usr/lib. + To change this, set LIBDIR to the appropriate directory. + + Set SKIPTAR=y to skip tar file creation. "} name=$1 build_options=$2 -for jarfile in $(find -name \*.jar); do +# There's this great concept - it's called databases with no fixed size limits! +# For now, kludge the fixed size limit at 80000 +gcj-dbtool -n $name.db 80000 + +# Use type -f to ignore symlinks +for jarfile in $(find -type f -name \*.jar); do # This is ugly. What we want is to be able to natively-compile all the # jars within an RPM build tree as well as from an arbitrary location # in the filesystem. Patches welcome :) so_dir="./$name/$(dirname $jarfile | \ sed 's:^\.\+/::')"; mkdir -p $so_dir; - dest_so_name=$so_dir/lib`basename $jarfile`.so + dest_so_name=$so_dir/lib$name-`basename $jarfile`.so nativify $jarfile $dest_so_name "$build_options" + gcj-dbtool -f $name.db $jarfile ${LIBDIR:-/usr/lib}/$dest_so_name done -tar czf $name.tar.gz $name +if [ -z "${SKIPTAR:-}" ]; then + tar czf $name.tar.gz $name +fi

3 2

Debugging native java libs loaded via lookup in classmap.db
by Robin Green 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

Currently, it seems impossible to set breakpoints with gdb in native libraries loaded via the new classmap.db mechanism, aka the 'BC API'. (I know that the library in question _is_ being loaded, because it appears in a stack trace in the debuggee!) I have filed this problem as gdb PR 1907 (see http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?database=gdb ). -- Robin

1 0

Re: PDF generation problem solved for me
by David Malcolm 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 11:41 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com>, spake thus: > > > There was some list traffic about this several times in the not-too- > > distant past... I can't remember the content of all the discussions, but > > the idea of whether to use FOP was definitely tossed around. Could > > anyone with some time and inclination check the archives and try to > > summarize the discussions here? Or is that unnecessary? If someone > > were to do that, I would put a page up on the wiki in an agreeable place > > (and with an agreeable name) just so we have a reference point. > > The concern was that FOP needed some non-GPL assistance to render > some graphic content. Specifically, FOP can render BMP, EPS, GIF, > JPEG and TIFF files without any assistance. With JIMI or JAI (which > are not GPL'ed), PNG can be rendered. With BATIK, also an Apache > product, SVG files can also be rendered. > > None of the non-free assistant packages are included or distributed > with FOP. FOP will notice these add-ons if present, but will work > without them, with the only caveat being PNG input will not work. > > The official details are at http://xml.apache.org/fop/graphics.html, > for those who are interested. CC-ing to fedora-devel-java-list Surely there must be a GPL-friendly PNG handler in Java somewhere? How hard would it be to rewrite this part of FOP? What's the status of getting a natively-compiled FOP into Fedora?

3 3

Microsoft Office 2003 - very low price
by Vanessa J. Smith 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

Get all the popular software possible for prices substantially lower than in stores! We sell software 2-6 times cheaper than retail price. Examples: $79.95 Windows XP Professional (Including: Service Pack 2) $89.95 Microsoft Office 2003 Professional / $79.95 Office XP Professional $99.95 Adobe Photoshop 8.0/CS (Including: ImageReady CS) $179.95 Macromedia Studio MX 2004 (Including: Dreamweaver MX + Flash MX + Fireworks MX) $79.95 Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional $69.95 Quark Xpress 6 Passport Multilanguage Special Offers: $89.95 Windows XP Professional + Office XP Professional $149.95 Adobe Creative Suite Premium (5 CD) $129.95 Adobe Photoshop 7 + Adobe Premiere 7 + Adobe Illustrator 10 All main products from Microsoft, Adobe, Macromedia, Corel, etc. And many other... Enter here: http://dst.gbverdunde.com/?OxQnk3Ok0mpZ2Cidst Best, Vanessa Smith _____________________________________________________ To be taken off future campaigns, go here: http://dst.gbverdunde.com/<RANDOM>?IrehKZIKqgPnYwcdst _____________________________________________________

1 0

こんばんわ？
by }CR 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

ネットのエッチビデオに出たんだけど、やっぱりマイコのこと皆知ってるのかな？この前ゆきに話したときには、誰も知らないって言っていたから大丈夫だと思うけど。マイコもだけど、ゆきも出ちゃってるよ（上の方）？ここ↓ http://218.24.145.241/fly/?xk43thzh6t3gzgdth2edgue$5elqxhmdg24 ちなつさんって綺麗だけどあったことないし、あみさんってゆき、この前話してなかったっけ？でも、綺麗にとって貰えたからいいか（＾＾）かよこさんは旦那にバレてないかしんぱいだね。あと「コスプレ娘」「妹萌え」って、「コスプレ妹萌え」って読んじゃいそうで面白いね。 ※　　このメールは細心の注意を払い重複のないよう送信していますが万一重複してしまった場合はご容赦ください。 ※２　番組はアダルトコンテンツを含み有料です。 ※３　１８歳未満の方はリンクをクリックしないで下さい。 ※４　配信拒否はこのまま送り返してください。

1 0

Re: [fedora-java] db merging script
by Tom Tromey 05 Apr '05

05 Apr '05

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph(a)redhat.com> writes: Andrew> The right way to fix this is to have gcj-dbtool read a list of files Andrew> from stdin, which is what this patch does. Andrew> (find . -name 'temp-*.db' | gcj-dbtool - -m $DB) This needs a corresponding gcj.texi patch. Tom

2 6

db merging script
by Andrew Overholt 05 Apr '05

05 Apr '05

This is a crude example of what we could have, but it's what I've got so far: %post -n %{libname}-gtk2 if ![ -e `gcj-dbtool -p` ]; then dirname `gcj-dbtool -p` | xargs mkdir -p; gcj-dbtool -n `gcj-dbtool -p`; fi if [ -n "`find %{_libdir}/%{name}/mappings -name \*.db`" ]; then gcj-dbtool -m `gcj-dbtool -p` `find %{_libdir}/%{name}/mappings -name \*.db` `gcj-dbtool -p` fi %postun %{libname}-gtk2 if [ -n "`find %{_libdir}/%{name}/mappings -name \*.db`" ]; then gcj-dbtool -m `gcj-dbtool -p` `find %{_libdir}/%{name}/mappings -name \*.db` `gcj-dbtool -p` fi I'm not even sure if what I have will work. I'd just like to start the discussion about how best to do it. Anthony Green has raised valid concerns about multilib systems. Andrew

10 47

Debuginfo problems
by Robin Green 03 Apr '05

03 Apr '05

3 problems with building -debuginfo packages for native java packages. I'm using latest rawhide, find-and-nativify to nativify [which I keep typo-ing as nativity for some reason ;) ] and ecj as source-to-bytecode compiler. 1. gcj outputs bogus source filenames for inner classes, which makes rpmbuild spew a shedload of errors like this when building the -debuginfo package: cpio: rssowl_1_1_src/src/java/net/sourceforge/rssowl/controller/GUI$4.java: No such file or directory I filed this as http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20735 2. cpio outputs some more "No such file or directory errors" referring to a few classes whose source files aren't part of this project at all, e.g. cpio: rssowl_1_1_src/src/java/org/xml/sax/EntityResolver.java: No such file or directory cpio: rssowl_1_1_src/src/java/org/xml/sax/ErrorHandler.java: No such file or directory cpio: rssowl_1_1_src/src/java/org/xml/sax/InputSource.java: No such file or directory cpio: rssowl_1_1_src/src/java/org/xml/sax/SAXParseException.java: No such file or directory 3. For some strange reason - I only changed like one line in my spec file - I'm now getting this odd error: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/rssowl-1.1-1rdg error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/rssowl/librssowl.jar.so.debug /usr/src/debug/rssowl_1_1_src/src/java/net/sourceforge/rssowl/controller/ChannelInfo.java /usr/src/debug/rssowl_1_1_src/src/java/net/sourceforge/rssowl/controller/DisposeListenerImpl.java etc. (continues with list of lots and lots of source files) So, I'm turning off -debuginfo building for my specfile for now. -- Robin

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

java-devel April 2005