I have an infrequently used Java chatbot app - mostly accessed from
which connects with the chatbot running on my Fedora 25 x86_64 server.
Because it is infrequently used, it appears that Java is caching most of
the app to disk. When I start a new conversation I can hear the disk in
the server next to me churning and it takes some time before I get a
response from the bot - and also the delay seems to be causing problems
between FB and the bot on my server causing messages to be repeated etc.
Is there some way to force the OS to NOT disk cache the Java app so that
it will always respond as quickly as possible - even if there are long
periods between chats?
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
Here is an article that I found by chance, but it turned out so interesting that I decided to share it with you, you can find it here http://shaketh.investinginmadison.com
Looking forward, paul
From: Fedora Java Development List [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2017 6:40 PM
The new Ohmwrecker is awesome. I've been building it whenever I'm planning to dive turrets or have two or more teammates who like diving turrets. The build path is excellent (Kindlegem is one of the best items in the game, and Raptor Cloak is a great early spike for people who like to dive turrets) and it offers so much utility (I've rescued multiple teammates, secured a couple of turrets by prolonging the amount of time we had before it killed our minion wave, and even ended a game by using it on nexus turrets so that we didn't have to tank them for long).
It's also a pretty nice counter to Azir's passive.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
I'm trying to get FindBugs into EPEL 7, but need a newer version of ASM
than is currently available in RHEL 7 or CentOS 7.
I saw this thread:
I think Christopher found a workaround for his case, and therefore didn't
end up needing ASM 5. For FindBugs, however, I think I will need ASM 5.
As far as I can tell, in RHEL 7 and CentOS 7, "objectweb-asm" is ASM 3, and
"objectweb-asm4" provides ASM 4.
I therefore have the same question that Christopher asked:
> How does one go about packaging version 5 for EPEL7? Should I use the
> epel7 branch of objectweb-asm to create an objectweb-asm5 package for
> EPEL7? Or, should I fork the objectweb-asm repo and submit a new package
> review for objectweb-asm5?