Quoting David Walluck (2013-02-22 21:23:14)
> In the current guidelines, at least as implemented, most jars are
> renamed from upstream. There's not even the policy of preferring
> the
> upstream name by default. The policy seems to be to rename them
> from
> upstream by default (at least with multiple jars).
FYI, in case it wasn't obvious: when you build a package with XMvn it
will put
jar files in %_javadir/%{name}/%{artifactId}.jar
I believe this solves both problems for Fedora (always unique non
conflicting
paths) and yours (jar file renaming). You can do simple 'find
/usr/share/java
-name some-weird-artifact.jar' and get a valid reply. Perhaps even
multiple :-)
I hope that will make you a bit happier :-)
I will only be happy when it goes to
%_javadir/%{groupid}/%{artifactId}/<version>/%{artifactId}-%{version}.jar
with a link for backwrd compatibility perhaps :-)
(snip)
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Developer Experience