From: "Carlo de Wolf" <cdewolf(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:49:09 AM
Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Fedora vs JPackage naming
On 02/17/2012 10:10 AM, David Walluck wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 03:43 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>> So the only solution that at least have chances to satisfy our
>> needs is Ivy :).
> The point is that something as simple as
> %_javadir/<artifactId>-<version>.<extension> probably satisfies
> out of
> 4 requirements, and ivy also supports maven artifact patterns
> it is just another location, which could be a simple symlink).
> So I would agree with you if supporting these crazy builds systems
> requires a lot (or even a little) extra work.
> But it seems to me that we get support for free (or at least as
> best we
> can, by sticking to the simple flat dir and naming structure
> java-devel mailing list
I just would like to see maven artifacts 'properly' installed in
Then we can let upstream maven (and other tools) use that.
I would even say that this is the only viable solution for the maven and friends and this
doesn't interfere with the other buildsystems so everyone that cares about Maven -
Join Carlo and help him achieve that
java-devel mailing list