On Mar 10 mai 2005 16:33, Gary Benson a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> If a package is present in
jpackage.org but is slightly different in
> Fedora Extras that usualy means it had to include some gcj-specific
> changes.
Actually, for s/Fedora Extras/Fedora Core/ this is not strictly true.
Firstly, many of the packages have had their non-free dependencies
slashed out. This doesn't mean they don't _work_ on gcj, it just
means we're not using them for moral reasons.
Well when I wrote gcj-specific I meant gcj+gnu classpath specific problems;)
Obviously if the harmony guys want a full j2ee replacement they'll have to
take care of all those non-free dependency holes too.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot