-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 06/14/2012 09:50 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Quoting Michel Alexandre Salim (2012-06-14 09:31:20)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Yes, I've already noticed
> several bugs in maven2 subpackages -- normally when some
> compatibility submodules are not shipped, but it turns out that
> the ones that are shipped depend on Maven submodules where the
> APIs have changed between 2.x and 3.x.
Well my personal goal is to get rid of as much maven2 as possible.
If it was possible the package would not exist already, but
alas...there is still some need for it
> Speaking of which, could someone take a look at this maven2
> bugfix request?
I have seen the bug (I am effectively maven2 maintainer), but I
didn't want to commit anything yet.
Now, we have a changes to the guidelines in the pipeline which
would make it possible to package compat version of maven2
artifacts (even those that conflict with maven-3.x in gid:aid).
Aha, great! I independently tried that tack when I discovered some
modules were missing -- just build them on top of Maven 3. Works but I
find to my (not-so-)amusement that they inherit the version number of
the Maven used to build them -- potentially dangerous.
Will take a look. Ping me when this goes to the FPC so I can join that
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: salimma(a)fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hircus(a)jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hircus(a)irc.freenode.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
- against proprietary attachments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----