Andrew John Hughes wrote:
David Herron @ Sun wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 54M 2008-09-08 13:39
>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24M 2008-10-21 15:40
>>>> Why so much bigger?
>>> I'd open them up and diff the trees.
>> Interesting. Assuming they both have similar contents, it could be
>> that the IcedTea builds enable debug info.
>> Andrew :)
> We also appear to be using pack200 for packaging the .jar's and IIRC
> that strips out a bunch of stuff.
> Assuming that 184.108.40.206 rt.jar above came from a DLJ bundle, I just
> looked at the DLJ bundle and it's doing unpack200 ... and there are
> files whose name ends with '.pack' inside.
> - David
But isn't this the same 'we' i.e. why isn't the OpenJDK build doing
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
Good question, I don't know.
I just grepped through the source tree which will soon be posted as the
openjdk6 tree and don't see any use of pack200. I found the makefiles
that build pack200 but it doesn't appear to be used in an openjdk build.