Re: [fedora-java] What does the maven "groupId" mean?

[Deepak Bhole]

* Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster(a)gmail.com&gt; [2009-10-22 10:31]:
>  Looking more closely at my current /etc/maven/maven2-depmap.xml
> file,
>  I notice a range of conventions for what fragments are called. Here
>  are a few examples:
>  
Hi Mary,

The target of the mapping contains a groupid, artifactid and version.
The former two are used to determine where on the file system the jar is
located. The convention is detailed in the readme:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/JPPMavenReadme

Cheers,
Deepak
 
>  For jakarta-commons-lang (from Fedora):
>  <dependency>
>      <maven>
>          <groupId>lang</groupId>
>          <artifactId>lang</artifactId>
>          <version>2.3</version>
>      </maven>
>      <jpp>
>          <groupId>JPP</groupId>
>          <artifactId>jakarta-commons-lang</artifactId>
>          <version>2.3</version>
>      </jpp>
>  </dependency>
>  
>  For jakarta-commons-logging (from JPackage):
>  <dependency>
>      <maven>
>          <groupId>commons-logging</groupId>
>          <artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId>
>          <version>1.1</version>
>      </maven>
>      <jpp>
>          <groupId>JPP</groupId>
>          <artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId>
>          <version>1.1</version>
>      </jpp>
>  </dependency>
>  
>  For ant (from Fedora):
>  <dependency>
>      <maven>
>          <groupId>org.apache.ant</groupId>
>          <artifactId>ant</artifactId>
>          <version>1.7.1</version>
>      </maven>
>      <jpp>
>          <groupId>JPP</groupId>
>          <artifactId>ant</artifactId>
>          <version>1.7.1</version>
>      </jpp>
>  </dependency>
>  
>  For aqute-bindlib (from Fedora):
>  <dependency>
>      <maven>
>          <groupId>biz.aQute</groupId>
>          <artifactId>bndlib</artifactId>
>          <version>0.0.363</version>
>      </maven>
>      <jpp>
>          <groupId>JPP</groupId>
>          <artifactId>aqute-bndlib</artifactId>
>          <version>0.0.363</version>
>      </jpp>
>  </dependency>
>  
>  So should the groupId be the package name, the full project name, the
>  sub-project name, or what? And what's the role of the "JPP" part in
>  all of this? There seem to be several different conventions going on
>  ...
>  
>  Thanks for any light you can shed,
>  
>  MEF
>  
>  -- 
>  Mary Ellen Foster -- http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/
>  Interaction Lab -- http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/InteractionLab
>  School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University
>  
>  Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity
>  number SC000278
>  
>  --
>  fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
>  fedora-devel-java-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list