* Anthony Green <green(a)redhat.com> [2005-05-19 10:27]:
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 17:57 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Tom Tromey <tromey(a)redhat.com> [2005-05-18 17:54]:
> > Anthony ran into some problem where oprofile was finding the wrong
> > symbols. He upgraded and this was fixed. I don't know what versions
> > are affected.
> I ran CVS head opreport as Anthony suggested (he said opcontrol was fine to
> use with the binary in FC4's package).
Can you triple check that? When I run opreport from FC4 I get the same
goofy looking report you do for this task (with
java.lang.Compiler.Compiler, etc). But when I run the opreport I built
from oprofile cvs sources I get a really believable report where
everything appears to make sense.
I don't have time to re-test, but I don't know if I mentioned before that
setting my CVS compression to 3 helped immensely.