Ian Pilcher wrote:
Gary Benson wrote:
> Suggestions welcome :)
I'm not sure what the best solution is, but here are some
alternatives to consider:
1. Change the names of gcj packages, so that they don't match the
JPackage versions. For example, gcj-tomcat5 could "provide"
tomcat5. It should be pretty easy to conditionalize this in
the SPEC files.
You wouldn't believe how awful this is. I've done it before, for
Stronghold. It seems trivial, but it's actually a nightmare, and
the total package count in Stronghold was a tenth of what we're
dealing with now.
2. Move the Fedora gcj packages into a separate repository from
the
rest of the distribution. This would at least allow people to
create a "pure" JPackage system by simply disabling this repo.
That's all I can think of for now. Perhaps others have ideas.
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher i.pilcher(a)comcast.net
========================================================================
--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list