Ian Pilcher wrote:
Gary Benson wrote:
Suggestions welcome :)
I'm not sure what the best solution is, but here are some alternatives to consider:
- Change the names of gcj packages, so that they don't match the JPackage versions. For example, gcj-tomcat5 could "provide" tomcat5. It should be pretty easy to conditionalize this in the SPEC files.
You wouldn't believe how awful this is. I've done it before, for Stronghold. It seems trivial, but it's actually a nightmare, and the total package count in Stronghold was a tenth of what we're dealing with now.
- Move the Fedora gcj packages into a separate repository from the rest of the distribution. This would at least allow people to create a "pure" JPackage system by simply disabling this repo.
That's all I can think of for now. Perhaps others have ideas.
--
Ian Pilcher i.pilcher@comcast.net
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list