Fwd: [jboss-rpm] WildFly available in Fedora!

[Marek Goldmann]

WildFly in Fedora - things looking good, read below :)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [jboss-rpm] WildFly available in Fedora!
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:40:58 +0200
From: Marek Goldmann <mgoldman(a)redhat.com&gt;
To: jboss-rpm(a)lists.jboss.org <jboss-rpm(a)lists.jboss.org&gt;

Hi All,

Great news - WildFly Application Server is now available in Fedora
Rawhide (and soon in Fedora 20 too!).

Thanks to Mikołaj - I finished the review process for the wildfly
package yesterday:

	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995045

Please join me in helping all the people involved in this process,
especially Gil Cattaneo and Mikołaj Izdebski. Those guys really helped me!

The jboss-as package is now retired in Fedora 20+. If you try to install
jboss-as, wildfly will be picked up automatically.

After you test wildfly in Fedora 20, please bump the karma for the package:

	https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wildfly-8.0.0-0.6.Alpha3.fc20

If you're interested in receiving mails about issues assigned to wildfly
and/or want to be up to date with the updates - please add yourself to
the wildfly package:

	https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/wildfly

What's next?

Glad you ask :) The next step is to upgrade to 8.0.0.Alpha4 of course.
This will simplify the package. Over the next weeks I'll test the
package and fix all issues. If you find some on your own - please report
them in Bugzilla for the wildfly component:

	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&component=wi...

I've created a Change proposal for the upcoming Fedora 20 where I would
like to see WildFly being highlighted as a Feature:

	https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WildFly8

Unfortunately the time for submitting Features is now over, but I'm
working for an exception. Wish me luck :)

Thanks!

--Marek
_______________________________________________
jboss-rpm mailing list
jboss-rpm(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-rpm

[Mat Booth]

On 10 September 2013 09:41, Marek Goldmann <mgoldman(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  WildFly in Fedora - things looking good, read below :)
>
>
>  I've created a Change proposal for the upcoming Fedora 20 where I would
>  like to see WildFly being highlighted as a Feature:
>
>         
> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Changes/WildFly8<https://fedoraprojec...
>
>  Unfortunately the time for submitting Features is now over, but I'm
>  working for an exception. Wish me luck :)
>
>  Thanks!
>  

Nice job.

"The work is already done" seems like a valid reason for an exception, good
luck! :-)


-- 
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora

[Mat Booth]

On 10 September 2013 10:00, Mat Booth <fedora(a)matbooth.co.uk&gt; wrote:

>  On 10 September 2013 09:41, Marek Goldmann
> <mgoldman(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>
> > WildFly in Fedora - things looking good, read below :)
> >
> >
> > I've created a Change proposal for the upcoming Fedora 20 where I would
> > like to see WildFly being highlighted as a Feature:
> >
> >        
> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Changes/WildFly8<https://fedoraprojec...
> >
> > Unfortunately the time for submitting Features is now over, but I'm
> > working for an exception. Wish me luck :)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
>
>  Nice job.
>
>  "The work is already done" seems like a valid reason for an exception,
>  good luck! :-)
>
>
>  --
>  Mat Booth
>  http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
>  

BTW, just looking at the package I see this:

Provides:         jboss-as = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:        jboss-as < 7.1.1-21

I don't think that will obsolete this build of jboss-as:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=462139

I think it should be:

Provides:         jboss-as = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:        jboss-as <= 7.1.1-21

Or:

Provides:         jboss-as = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:        jboss-as < 7.1.1-22

Does that make sense?

-- 
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora

[Marek Goldmann]

Right, the -21 version was a bugfix release pushed after I changed it in 
the wildfly spec. I would even vote for doing:

Provides:         jboss-as = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:        jboss-as < 7.1.1-999

to be sure that the upgrade path will be correct since I don't know how 
many bugfix updates I'll push into F19.

Thanks for catching this!

--Marek

On 10.09.2013 11:12, Mat Booth wrote:
>  On 10 September 2013 10:00, Mat Booth <fedora(a)matbooth.co.uk
>  <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>      On 10 September 2013 09:41, Marek Goldmann <mgoldman(a)redhat.com
>      <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>          WildFly in Fedora - things looking good, read below :)
>
>
>          I've created a Change proposal for the upcoming Fedora 20 where
>          I would
>          like to see WildFly being highlighted as a Feature:
>
>          https://fedoraproject.org/__wiki/Changes/WildFly8
>          <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WildFly8>
>
>          Unfortunately the time for submitting Features is now over, but I'm
>          working for an exception. Wish me luck :)
>
>          Thanks!
>
>
>
>      Nice job.
>
>      "The work is already done" seems like a valid reason for an
>      exception, good luck! :-)
>
>
>      --
>      Mat Booth
>      http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
>
>
>
>  BTW, just looking at the package I see this:
>
>  Provides:         jboss-as = %{version}-%{release}
>  Obsoletes:        jboss-as < 7.1.1-21
>
>  I don't think that will obsolete this build of jboss-as:
>  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=462139
>
>  I think it should be:
>
>  Provides:         jboss-as = %{version}-%{release}
>  Obsoletes:        jboss-as <= 7.1.1-21
>
>  Or:
>
>  Provides:         jboss-as = %{version}-%{release}
>  Obsoletes:        jboss-as < 7.1.1-22
>
>  Does that make sense?
>
>  --
>  Mat Booth
>  http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora