* Pascal Rapicault Pascal_Rapicault@ca.ibm.com [2007-03-28 21:20]:
This is for a simple overview, there are other refinements (mostly around the use clause) that I won't go into here and that you can find in the OSGi spec: http://osgi.org/osgi_technology/download_specs.asp?section=2#Release4
Thanks for the clarification, Pascal.
I guess you could liken import to just relying on a non-package name Provide of an RPM -- something like what we're trying to for with these automatic provides. You could say "Requires: libgcj.so.7rh" instead of "Requires: libgcj" or "Requires: libgcj = 4.1.1". But I think this is different than what you describe and I don't know how yum or other depsolvers deal with multiple packages Provide'ing the same thing.
Andrew "poor explanation" Overholt
Le Jeu 29 mars 2007 03:40, Andrew Overholt a écrit :
But I think this is different than what you describe and I don't know how yum or other depsolvers deal with multiple packages Provide'ing the same thing.
The one already installed wins. If no installed package provides a dep, and several options are available, package with shortest name wins
Regards,
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org