* Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> [2008-08-28 16:18]:
Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> [2008-08-28 14:09]:
>> for feature in org.eclipse.photran_feature org.eclipse.photran.intel \
> We usually try to match features to binary RPMs.
>> Now the issue seems to be how/where to install. Each of the zip
>> files created starts with the directory "eclipse/" and 3 contain
>> "eclipse/contents.xml" files (which are different) so I don't think
>> they should unzip into the same directory. What makes sense?
> If you want them to all be in the same binary RPM, just unzip them all
> there and remove the content.xml. content.xml is just for speeding up
> the first startup after this plugin is installed and isn't strictly
I'm not sure if any of the other features are useful independent of each
other or if you ever would want "photran_feature" without
"photran.vpg_feature". I've asked upstream.
Okay. Just dump them in the same place if you don't want separation.
Should I remove the second "eclipse" or not bother?
Yeah, remove it. It'll work, but it's better without it. Some time
soon (before F10) I am going to go through all of the plugins we have in
Fedora and fix this.