Re: [fedora-java] [Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Andrew Overholt]

Hi Chris,

Java/Maven-specific questions like this should probably be directed to
java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org first.

Andrew

* Chris Spike <chris.spike(a)arcor.de&gt; [2010-07-08 15:59]:
>  Hi,
>  
>  Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
>  There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
>  JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
>  JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
>  Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
>  JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
>  JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
>  this is up to taste?
>  
>  Regards, Chris
>  
>  [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
>  --
>  packaging mailing list
>  packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Orion Poplawski]

On 07/08/2010 02:04 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>  Hi Chris,
>
>  Java/Maven-specific questions like this should probably be directed to
>  java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org first.
>
>  Andrew
>
>  * Chris Spike<chris.spike(a)arcor.de>  [2010-07-08 15:59]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
> > There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
> > JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
> > JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
> > Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
> > JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
> > JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
> > this is up to taste?
> >
> > Regards, Chris
> >
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
> > -- 
Also, it shows:

%add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}

But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: [phone]
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Deepak Bhole]

* Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com&gt; [2010-07-08 16:30]:
>  On 07/08/2010 02:04 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>  > Hi Chris,
>  >
>  > Java/Maven-specific questions like this should probably be directed to
>  > java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org first.
>  >
>  > Andrew
>  >
>  > * Chris Spike&lt;chris.spike(a)arcor.de&gt;  [2010-07-08 15:59]:
>  >> Hi,
>  >>
>  >> Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
>  >> There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
>  >> JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
>  >> JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
>  >> Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
>  >> JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
>  >> JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
>  >> this is up to taste?
>  >> 
It is up to taste I guess. As long as the name follows the rules here,
it will continue to work:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/JPPMavenReadme#POM_file_names

>  >> Regards, Chris
>  >>
>  >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
>  >> --
>  
>  Also, it shows:
>  
>  %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
>  
>  But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
>  parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
>  
Agreed. It should be something like:

%add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP
%{name}
 
Cheers,
Deepak

>  
>  -- 
>  Orion Poplawski
>  Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
>  NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: [phone]
>  3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion(a)cora.nwra.com
>  Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com
>  --
>  java-devel mailing list
>  java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Chris Spike]

On 07/08/2010 10:50 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:

> >> * Chris Spike<chris.spike(a)arcor.de>  [2010-07-08
> 15:59]:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
> >>> There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
> >>> JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
> >>> JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
> >>> Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
> >>> JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
> >>> JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
> >>> this is up to taste?
> >>>
>  
>  It is up to taste I guess. As long as the name follows the rules here,
>  it will continue to work:
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/JPPMavenReadme#POM_file_names 
It says:

JPP[.<subdir name under %{_javadir}>] -jarname.pom

So I guess JPP-commons-codec.pom is ok and JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom is
a bug?


> >>> [1]
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
> >>> --
> >
> > Also, it shows:
> >
> > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
> >
> > But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
> > parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
> >
>  
>  Agreed. It should be something like:
>  
>  %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP
> %{name} 
Ok, that helps. Thanks.

Regards, Chris

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Andrew Overholt]

Hi Deepak,

>  > Also, it shows:
>  > 
>  > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
>  > 
>  > But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
>  > parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
>  >
>  
>  Agreed. It should be something like:
>  
>  %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP
> %{name} 
Please take this modification to the guidelines to the Fedora packaging
committee for inclusion on the wiki.

Thanks,

Andrew

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[David Walluck]

On 07/08/2010 05:26 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>  Hi Deepak,
>  
> > > Also, it shows:
> > > 
> > > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
> > > 
> > > But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
> > > parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
> > >
> > 
> > Agreed. It should be something like:
> > 
> > %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version}
> JPP %{name}
>  
>  Please take this modification to the guidelines to the Fedora packaging
>  committee for inclusion on the wiki. 
The second argument is not %{name}, but the artifactId, so it's more like

%add_to_maven_depmap <groupId> <artifactId> <version>
JPP[/path/relative/to/%{_javadir}] <jar>

The third argument is typically ignored, and in fact, even here, it
should be the version in the pom, which is almost always (but not
necessarily) the same as %{version}.

-- 
Sincerely,

David Walluck
<david(a)zarb.org&gt;

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Guido Grazioli]

2010/7/9 David Walluck <david(a)zarb.org&gt;:
>  On 07/08/2010 05:26 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > Hi Deepak,
> >
> >> > Also, it shows:
> >> >
> >> > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
> >> >
> >> > But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the
> appropriate
> >> > parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Agreed. It should be something like:
> >>
> >> %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name}
> %{version} JPP %{name}
> >
> > Please take this modification to the guidelines to the Fedora packaging
> > committee for inclusion on the wiki.
>
>  The second argument is not %{name}, but the artifactId, so it's more like
>
>  %add_to_maven_depmap <groupId> <artifactId> <version>
>  JPP[/path/relative/to/%{_javadir}] <jar>
>
>  The third argument is typically ignored, and in fact, even here, it
>  should be the version in the pom, which is almost always (but not
>  necessarily) the same as %{version}.
>  
We had some discussions on that topic before, in response
to this proposal:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Abo/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate
which looks better than current guidelines imho

cheers


-- 
Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli(a)gmail.com&gt;
Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA)
Mobile: [phone] (10-18)
Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337  DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278
Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli