Re: [fedora-java] [Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Andrew Overholt]

Hi Chris,

Java/Maven-specific questions like this should probably be directed to
[e-mail] first.

Andrew

* Chris Spike  [2010-07-08 15:59]:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
> There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
> JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
> JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
> Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
> JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
> JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
> this is up to taste?
>
> Regards, Chris
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
>
> packaging mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Orion Poplawski]

On 07/08/2010 02:04 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Java/Maven-specific questions like this should probably be directed to
> [e-mail] first.
>
> Andrew
> Chris Spike  [2010-07-08 15:59]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
> > There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
> > JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
> > JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
> > Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
> > JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
> > JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
> > this is up to taste?
> >
> > Regards, Chris
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2

Also, it shows:

%add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}

But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Deepak Bhole]

* Orion Poplawski  [2010-07-08 16:30]:
> On 07/08/2010 02:04 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Java/Maven-specific questions like this should probably be directed to
> > [e-mail] first.
> >
> > Andrew
> > Chris Spike  [2010-07-08 15:59]:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
> > > There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
> > > JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
> > > JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
> > > Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
> > > JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
> > > JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
> > > this is up to taste?

It is up to taste I guess. As long as the name follows the rules here,
it will continue to work:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/JPPMavenReadme#POM_file_names
> > > Regards, Chris
> > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
>
> Also, it shows:
>
> %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
>
> But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
> parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.

Agreed. It should be something like:

%add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}

Cheers,
Deepak
> -- 
> Orion Poplawski
> Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
> NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: [phone]
> 3380 Mitchell Lane                  [e-mail]
> Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Chris Spike]

On 07/08/2010 10:50 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > > Chris Spike  [2010-07-08 15:59]:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
> > > > There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
> > > > JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
> > > > JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
> > > > Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
> > > > JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
> > > > JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
> > > > this is up to taste?
>
> It is up to taste I guess. As long as the name follows the rules here,
> it will continue to work:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/JPPMavenReadme#POM_file_names

It says:

JPP[.<subdir name under %{_javadir}>] -jarname.pom

So I guess JPP-commons-codec.pom is ok and JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom is
a bug?
> > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
> >
> > Also, it shows:
> >
> > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
> >
> > But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
> > parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
>
> Agreed. It should be something like:
>
> %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}

Ok, that helps. Thanks.

Regards, Chris

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Andrew Overholt]

Hi Deepak,
> > Also, it shows:
> >
> > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
> >
> > But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
> > parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
>
> Agreed. It should be something like:
>
> %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}

Please take this modification to the guidelines to the Fedora packaging
committee for inclusion on the wiki.

Thanks,

Andrew

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[David Walluck]

On 07/08/2010 05:26 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi Deepak,
> > > Also, it shows:
> > >
> > > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
> > >
> > > But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate 
> > > parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
> >
> > Agreed. It should be something like:
> >
> > %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
>
> Please take this modification to the guidelines to the Fedora packaging
> committee for inclusion on the wiki.

The second argument is not %{name}, but the artifactId, so it's more like

%add_to_maven_depmap <groupId> <artifactId> <version>
JPP[/path/relative/to/%{_javadir}] <jar>

The third argument is typically ignored, and in fact, even here, it
should be the version in the pom, which is almost always (but not
necessarily) the same as %{version}.

[Fedora-packaging] correct name for maven pom-file

[Guido Grazioli]

2010/7/9 David Walluck :
> On 07/08/2010 05:26 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > Hi Deepak,
> > > > Also, it shows:
> > > >
> > > > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
> > > >
> > > > But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate
> > > > parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
> > >
> > > Agreed. It should be something like:
> > >
> > > %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
> >
> > Please take this modification to the guidelines to the Fedora packaging
> > committee for inclusion on the wiki.
>
> The second argument is not %{name}, but the artifactId, so it's more like
>
> %add_to_maven_depmap <groupId> <artifactId> <version>
> JPP[/path/relative/to/%{_javadir}] <jar>
>
> The third argument is typically ignored, and in fact, even here, it
> should be the version in the pom, which is almost always (but not
> necessarily) the same as %{version}.

We had some discussions on that topic before, in response
to this proposal:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Abo/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate
which looks better than current guidelines imho

cheers