If you read Java SIG's latest meeting summary you know we decided to use this mailing list for commit messages addressed to java-sig pseudo-user.
Pseudo-user has been created and mailing list has been set-up to allow commit messages from monitored packages[1] (thanks to tibbs and mjw)
This means there will be quite a lot of messages incoming but they should be easy to filter with your mail client. If you want java-sig to monitor and check your commits you can add java-sig pseudo user to CC for your package. For old packages follow [2]. For new packages that you want to have monitored just add java-sig to CC when asking for SCM. This is not mandatory (at least for now), but still encouraged :-)
One thing to note: email of java-sig is this mailing list (fedora-java@l.f.o) but emails will be comming as if from comitter's email address as present in FAS. Currently ML is set-up to allow messages from @fedoraproject.org mail addresses. It will reject commit messages from other email addresses. If you use different mail for java-devel ML and for FAS then let me know off-list and I'll add exception for your email (I just don't feel like checking manually or scripting this right now).
I'll be sending similar notice to people on fedora-devel in case they want to add their packages to monitoring.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java/Monitored_packages [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Req...
On 12:55 Fri 05 Nov , Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
If you read Java SIG's latest meeting summary you know we decided to use this mailing list for commit messages addressed to java-sig pseudo-user.
Pseudo-user has been created and mailing list has been set-up to allow commit messages from monitored packages[1] (thanks to tibbs and mjw)
This means there will be quite a lot of messages incoming but they should be easy to filter with your mail client. If you want java-sig to monitor and check your commits you can add java-sig pseudo user to CC for your package. For old packages follow [2]. For new packages that you want to have monitored just add java-sig to CC when asking for SCM. This is not mandatory (at least for now), but still encouraged :-)
One thing to note: email of java-sig is this mailing list (fedora-java@l.f.o) but emails will be comming as if from comitter's email address as present in FAS. Currently ML is set-up to allow messages from @fedoraproject.org mail addresses. It will reject commit messages from other email addresses. If you use different mail for java-devel ML and for FAS then let me know off-list and I'll add exception for your email (I just don't feel like checking manually or scripting this right now).
Why can't these commit messages be sent to a new mailing list rather than flooding this one?
I'll be sending similar notice to people on fedora-devel in case they want to add their packages to monitoring.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java/Monitored_packages [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Req... -- Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotnicky@redhat.com Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 71A1677C Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
-- java-devel mailing list java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
Il giorno ven, 05/11/2010 alle 14.06 +0000, Dr Andrew John Hughes ha scritto:
On 12:55 Fri 05 Nov , Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
If you read Java SIG's latest meeting summary you know we decided to use this mailing list for commit messages addressed to java-sig pseudo-user.
Pseudo-user has been created and mailing list has been set-up to allow commit messages from monitored packages[1] (thanks to tibbs and mjw)
This means there will be quite a lot of messages incoming but they should be easy to filter with your mail client. If you want java-sig to monitor and check your commits you can add java-sig pseudo user to CC for your package. For old packages follow [2]. For new packages that you want to have monitored just add java-sig to CC when asking for SCM. This is not mandatory (at least for now), but still encouraged :-)
One thing to note: email of java-sig is this mailing list (fedora-java@l.f.o) but emails will be comming as if from comitter's email address as present in FAS. Currently ML is set-up to allow messages from @fedoraproject.org mail addresses. It will reject commit messages from other email addresses. If you use different mail for java-devel ML and for FAS then let me know off-list and I'll add exception for your email (I just don't feel like checking manually or scripting this right now).
Why can't these commit messages be sent to a new mailing list rather than flooding this one?
I second that, I like this follow his list and some times problem here arise that are of more general interest, but I would really like to not have floods of commit messages (I know I can filter them, but at times people reply to commit messages, things can become quite messy).
Cheers, Mario
On 11/05/2010 04:20 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
If you read Java SIG's latest meeting summary you know we decided to use this mailing list for commit messages addressed to java-sig pseudo-user.
Why can't these commit messages be sent to a new mailing list rather than flooding this one?
I second that, I like this follow his list and some times problem here arise that are of more general interest, but I would really like to not have floods of commit messages (I know I can filter them, but at times people reply to commit messages, things can become quite messy).
Hava a look at the meeting logs[1]. IIRC nobody wanted to put some work into this. I'm quite sure, people wouldn't mind if you take care. Just put it on the meeting agenda [2] and attend the next meeting.
Regards, Chris
[1] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-10-19/fedora-meeting.20... [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Java_SIG_2010-11-16
On 16:20 Fri 05 Nov , Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno ven, 05/11/2010 alle 14.06 +0000, Dr Andrew John Hughes ha scritto:
On 12:55 Fri 05 Nov , Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
If you read Java SIG's latest meeting summary you know we decided to use this mailing list for commit messages addressed to java-sig pseudo-user.
Pseudo-user has been created and mailing list has been set-up to allow commit messages from monitored packages[1] (thanks to tibbs and mjw)
This means there will be quite a lot of messages incoming but they should be easy to filter with your mail client. If you want java-sig to monitor and check your commits you can add java-sig pseudo user to CC for your package. For old packages follow [2]. For new packages that you want to have monitored just add java-sig to CC when asking for SCM. This is not mandatory (at least for now), but still encouraged :-)
One thing to note: email of java-sig is this mailing list (fedora-java@l.f.o) but emails will be comming as if from comitter's email address as present in FAS. Currently ML is set-up to allow messages from @fedoraproject.org mail addresses. It will reject commit messages from other email addresses. If you use different mail for java-devel ML and for FAS then let me know off-list and I'll add exception for your email (I just don't feel like checking manually or scripting this right now).
Why can't these commit messages be sent to a new mailing list rather than flooding this one?
I second that, I like this follow his list and some times problem here arise that are of more general interest, but I would really like to not have floods of commit messages (I know I can filter them, but at times people reply to commit messages, things can become quite messy).
Cheers, Mario -- pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/
Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/
So today I've had to delete about ten such e-mails on this list. Not only is this a waste of time, but the e-mails appear as bug reports in many cases and so get confused with real bug reports that I actually care about.
Please move these automated messages to a separate list.
Il giorno lun, 22/11/2010 alle 19.55 +0000, Dr Andrew John Hughes ha scritto:
So today I've had to delete about ten such e-mails on this list. Not only is this a waste of time, but the e-mails appear as bug reports in many cases and so get confused with real bug reports that I actually care about.
Please move these automated messages to a separate list.
I second that.
@Chris Spike:
Hava a look at the meeting logs[1]. IIRC nobody wanted to put some work into this. I'm quite sure, people wouldn't mind if you take care. Just put it on the meeting agenda [2] and attend the next meeting.
I understand your point, but I think Java SIG doesn't really have the right to change the behaviour of a list in this way, this was discussed only by two persons if I read the log correctly, but this decision has impact on every one who uses this list, and, I don't have time to follow SIG meetings or take care of anything else, it's quite bad, and I really would like to dedicate more time, but this is the way it is, and now this list has become just useless.
Making a new mailing list is cheap, or *if you really have to use this one*, just make a nice weekly summary, with a clear subject of what's going on, and don't flood us. This is even in the most minimal netiquette requirement, if not common sense.
Thanks, Mario
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 12:55 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
One thing to note: email of java-sig is this mailing list (fedora-java@l.f.o) but emails will be comming as if from comitter's email address as present in FAS. Currently ML is set-up to allow messages from @fedoraproject.org mail addresses. It will reject commit messages from other email addresses. If you use different mail for java-devel ML and for FAS then let me know off-list and I'll add exception for your email (I just don't feel like checking manually or scripting this right now).
I'll be sending similar notice to people on fedora-devel in case they want to add their packages to monitoring.
I added emails having scm-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org as destination as acceptable for this mailinglist. But I do agree that it might be a good idea to have a separate list for commits and discussion.
Cheers,
Mark
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org