[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : java-maint-sig Meeting

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
   At [e-mail]

The meeting will be about:
More information available at:
https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig

Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/

[Sérgio Basto]

On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000, [e-mail] wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>    java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
>    At [e-mail]
>
> The meeting will be about:
> More information available at:
> https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
>
> Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/

Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't find
any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)

(1)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...

wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt -q -O - | grep
"Depending on"

Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
ago)
Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
weeks ago)
Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
weeks ago)

[Peter Boy]

Hi Sérgio,

are you sure there was a meeting at all? And are you sure that invitation message isn’t a left over from ancient days that no one pays attention to anymore?

I've been lurking around for a while trying to figure out how I could contribute to Fedora Java. Not so easy.

Peter
> Am 29.06.2021 um 18:09 schrieb Sérgio Basto :
>
> On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000, [e-mail] wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >    java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
> >    At [e-mail]
> >
> > The meeting will be about:
> > More information available at:
> > https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
> >
> > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
>
> Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't find
> any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)
>
> (1)
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
>
> wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt -q -O - | grep
> "Depending on"
>
> Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
> ago)
> Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> weeks ago)
> Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
> Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
> Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> weeks ago)
>
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> _______________________________________________
> java-devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Mikolaj Izdebski]

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:07 PM Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000, [e-mail] wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >    java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
> >    At [e-mail]
> >
> > The meeting will be about:
> > More information available at:
> > https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
> >
> > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
>
> Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't find
> any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)

Not a problem IMHO.
jakarta-activation has been adopted.
eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
See inline comments below.
> (1)
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
>
> wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt -q -O - | grep
> "Depending on"
>
> Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
> ago)

Only jmc directly depends on HdrHistogram, nothing else.
> Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> weeks ago)

jakarta-activation is not orphaned, I already adopted it some time ago.
> Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)

Only eclipse directly depends on jmc. That dependency can be easily removed.
> Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)

Only jmc directly depends on jmc-core.
> Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> weeks ago)

Only jmc and jmc-core directly depend on owasp-java-encoder, nothing else.
> --
> Sérgio M. B.

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 12:06 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:07 PM Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000,
> > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> > >    java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00
> > > UTC
> > >    At [e-mail]
> > >
> > > The meeting will be about:
> > > More information available at:
> > > https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
> > >
> > > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
> >
> > Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't
> > find
> > any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)
>
> Not a problem IMHO.
> jakarta-activation has been adopted.
> eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
> See inline comments below.
> > (1)
> >
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
> >
> > wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt%C2%A0-q -O - | grep
> > "Depending on"
> >
> > Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
> > ago)
>
> Only jmc directly depends on HdrHistogram, nothing else.
> > Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> > weeks ago)
>
> jakarta-activation is not orphaned, I already adopted it some time ago.
> > Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
>
> Only eclipse directly depends on jmc. That dependency can be easily
> removed.
> > Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
>
> Only jmc directly depends on jmc-core.
> > Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> > weeks ago)
>
> Only jmc and jmc-core directly depend on owasp-java-encoder, nothing
> else.

great,  we just need keep eclipse-swt (1) because (2)

(1)
dnf repoquery --whatprovides "mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt)" --qf "%{repoid}
%{sourcerpm} %{name}"

(2)
openjfx (maintained by: deamn)
    openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-5.fc35.src requires mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) = 3.116.0.v20210304.1735

openjfx8 (maintained by: deamn)
    openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.src requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35, mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) = 3.116.0.v20210304.1735
    openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64 requires java-1.8.0-openjdk = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35

tuxguitar (maintained by: oget)
    tuxguitar-1.5.3-6.fc34.src requires eclipse-swt = 1:4.19-5.fc35
    tuxguitar-1.5.3-6.fc34.x86_64 requires eclipse-swt = 1:4.19-5.fc35

java-1.8.0-openjdk (maintained by: ahughes, dbhole, jerboaa, jvanek, michalvala, omajid)
    java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
    java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
    java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-fastdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
    java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-slowdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
    java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-fastdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
    java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-slowdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
    java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.src requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35

[Sérgio Basto]

Sorry I misread the repoquery command, eclipse-swt is part of eclipse
package that complicate things ...

On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 13:00 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 12:06 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:07 PM Sérgio Basto 
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000,
> > > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> > > >    java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to
> > > > 16:00:00
> > > > UTC
> > > >    At [e-mail]
> > > >
> > > > The meeting will be about:
> > > > More information available at:
> > > > https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
> > > >
> > > > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
> > >
> > > Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't
> > > find
> > > any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)
> >
> > Not a problem IMHO.
> > jakarta-activation has been adopted.
> > eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
> > See inline comments below.
> > > (1)
> > >  
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
> > >
> > > wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt%C2%A0-q -O - |
> > > grep
> > > "Depending on"
> > >
> > > Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> > > weeks
> > > ago)
> >
> > Only jmc directly depends on HdrHistogram, nothing else.
> > > Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18
> > > (1
> > > weeks ago)
> >
> > jakarta-activation is not orphaned, I already adopted it some time
> > ago.
> > > Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
> >
> > Only eclipse directly depends on jmc. That dependency can be easily
> > removed.
> > > Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
> > > ago)
> >
> > Only jmc directly depends on jmc-core.
> > > Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18
> > > (1
> > > weeks ago)
> >
> > Only jmc and jmc-core directly depend on owasp-java-encoder,
> > nothing
> > else.
>
> great,  we just need keep eclipse-swt (1) because (2)
>
> (1)
> dnf repoquery --whatprovides "mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt)" --qf
> "%{repoid}
> %{sourcerpm} %{name}"
>
> (2)
> openjfx (maintained by: deamn)
>         openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-5.fc35.src requires
> mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) = 3.116.0.v20210304.1735
>
> openjfx8 (maintained by: deamn)
>         openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.src requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-
> devel = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35, mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) =
> 3.116.0.v20210304.1735
>         openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64 requires java-1.8.0-
> openjdk = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35
>
> tuxguitar (maintained by: oget)
>         tuxguitar-1.5.3-6.fc34.src requires eclipse-swt = 1:4.19-
> 5.fc35
>         tuxguitar-1.5.3-6.fc34.x86_64 requires eclipse-swt = 1:4.19-
> 5.fc35
>
> java-1.8.0-openjdk (maintained by: ahughes, dbhole, jerboaa, jvanek,
> michalvala, omajid)
>         java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64
> requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
>         java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
> 0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-
> 26.b07.fc34
>         java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-fastdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
> 0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-
> 26.b07.fc34
>         java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-slowdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
> 0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-
> 26.b07.fc34
>         java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-fastdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
> 0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
>         java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-slowdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
> 0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
>         java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.src requires
> java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 12:06 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Not a problem IMHO.
> jakarta-activation has been adopted.
> eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
> See inline comments below.

Sorry I misread again, eclipse is to stay on fedora ...