Blojsom and Tomcat on FC4

[David J. Orme]

Hi all,

Today I tried to get Blojsom to run inside Tomcat as distributed with
FC4 test3 (with all updates applied as-of this morning).  It bombed with
an error in the log file about a malformed regular expression.

What is the correct place to report this bug?


Best regards,

Dave Orme
-- 
Eclipse Visual Editor Project lead
http://www.db4o.com -- The Open-source Java Object Database
http://xswt.sf.net  -- XML-based SWT page description language

[Tom Tromey]

> >>>> "David" == David J Orme
> <david(a)db4o.com&gt; writes: 
David> Today I tried to get Blojsom to run inside Tomcat as distributed with
David> FC4 test3 (with all updates applied as-of this morning).  It bombed with
David> an error in the log file about a malformed regular expression.

David> What is the correct place to report this bug?

> From the sound of it, either Classpath's bug tracker on savannah,
> or 
gcc bugzilla (either is fine, sometime soon these should be merged).

However in general I think it is fine to report bugs to the Red Hat
bugzilla.  Sometimes they might be RH specific; and we can push them
upstream after investigation.  (This particular one is almost
certainly an upstream bug.)

Tom

[Ziga Mahkovec]

On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 14:32 -0500, David J. Orme wrote:
>  Today I tried to get Blojsom to run inside Tomcat as distributed
> with
>  FC4 test3 (with all updates applied as-of this morning).  It bombed with
>  an error in the log file about a malformed regular expression. 
You're probably seeing the same problem Anthony reported some time ago:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435

I sent a classpath patch for review; the attached patch against blojsom
should also do the trick.  After applying it, blojsom seems to work fine
-- at least for the obligatory screenshot :)

http://bootchart.org/misc/blojsom-gcj.png
-- 
Ziga

[Gary Benson]

Ziga Mahkovec wrote:
>  On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 14:32 -0500, David J. Orme wrote:
>  > Today I tried to get Blojsom to run inside Tomcat as distributed
>  > with FC4 test3 (with all updates applied as-of this morning).  It
>  > bombed with an error in the log file about a malformed regular
>  > expression.
>  
>  You're probably seeing the same problem Anthony reported some time ago:
>  
>  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435
>  
>  I sent a classpath patch for review; the attached patch against
>  blojsom should also do the trick.  After applying it, blojsom seems
>  to work fine -- at least for the obligatory screenshot :)
>  
>  http://bootchart.org/misc/blojsom-gcj.png 
That's cool :D