Hi,
eclipse-mylar and eclipse-sdk-nls have finally hit rawhide! They should probably show up on mirrors sometime tomorrow.
Thanks to Kyu Lee who did all the work on the translations. He just showed me the SDK running with the Korean translations and it's pretty awesome.
As for Mylar, I'm aware of class library issues with gcj and I'm tracking them down now. Filing bugs would help with this as I'm sure I won't exercise all code paths. Thanks to Anthony and others who helped make this happen.
Andrew
* Andrew Overholt overholt@redhat.com [2007-03-20 17:18]:
As for Mylar, I'm aware of class library issues with gcj and I'm tracking them down now.
Here's one example of not being able to add a bugzilla task repository (https://bugs.eclipse.org in this case):
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.mylar.internal.bugzilla.ui.tasklist.BugzillaRepositorySettingsPage$3.run(BugzillaRepositorySettingsPage.java:210) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.run(org.eclipse.jface_3.2.2.M20061214-1200.jar.so) Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at javax.net.SocketFactory.createSocket(libgcj.so.8rh) at org.eclipse.mylar.internal.tasks.core.SslProtocolSocketFactory.createSocket(SslProtocolSocketFactory.java:101) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpConnection.open(HttpConnection.java:706) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager$HttpConnectionAdapter.open(MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager.java:1321) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector.executeWithRetry(HttpMethodDirector.java:386) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector.executeMethod(HttpMethodDirector.java:170) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient.executeMethod(HttpClient.java:396) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient.executeMethod(HttpClient.java:324) at org.eclipse.mylar.internal.bugzilla.core.BugzillaClient.connectInternal(BugzillaClient.java:261) at org.eclipse.mylar.internal.bugzilla.core.BugzillaClient.getConnect(BugzillaClient.java:221) at org.eclipse.mylar.internal.bugzilla.core.BugzillaClient.logout(BugzillaClient.java:292) at org.eclipse.mylar.internal.bugzilla.core.BugzillaClient.validate(BugzillaClient.java:206) at org.eclipse.mylar.internal.bugzilla.ui.tasklist.BugzillaRepositorySettingsPage$3.run(BugzillaRepositorySettingsPage.java:201) ...1 more
Andrew
Andrew Overholt writes:
- Andrew Overholt overholt@redhat.com [2007-03-20 17:18]:
As for Mylar, I'm aware of class library issues with gcj and I'm tracking them down now.
Here's one example of not being able to add a bugzilla task repository (https://bugs.eclipse.org in this case):
Without knowing the real class at javax.net.SocketFactory.createSocket(), no-one has a chance of figuring this out.
Andrew.
* Andrew Haley aph@redhat.com [2007-03-21 07:05]:
Andrew Overholt writes:
- Andrew Overholt overholt@redhat.com [2007-03-20 17:18]:
As for Mylar, I'm aware of class library issues with gcj and I'm tracking them down now.
Here's one example of not being able to add a bugzilla task repository (https://bugs.eclipse.org in this case):
Without knowing the real class at javax.net.SocketFactory.createSocket(), no-one has a chance of figuring this out.
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that someone should be able to. I plan to create a small test case today and file it.
Andrew
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 08:55 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that someone should be able to. I plan to create a small test case today and file it.
BTW. For those playing along at home, Andrew created http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31302 with a small test case, that has a fixed for it checked into classpath CVS by Casey now. Needs backporting to gcj and retesting now.
Cheers,
Mark
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 10:44 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 08:55 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that someone should be able to. I plan to create a small test case today and file it.
BTW. For those playing along at home, Andrew created http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31302 with a small test case, that has a fixed for it checked into classpath CVS by Casey now. Needs backporting to gcj and retesting now.
Wait, that is actually wrong. The fix that got checked into classpath CVS is for "FYI: fix keyUsage bit checking", the patch mentioned in the bug report isn't in CVS yet (waiting for more testing).
Cheers,
Mark
"Mark" == Mark Wielaard mark@klomp.org writes:
Mark> Wait, that is actually wrong. The fix that got checked into classpath Mark> CVS is for "FYI: fix keyUsage bit checking", the patch mentioned in the Mark> bug report isn't in CVS yet (waiting for more testing).
I was wondering if we need or want that keyUsage patch as well. Do you know?
Tom
Following up my own post.
Mark> Wait, that is actually wrong. The fix that got checked into classpath Mark> CVS is for "FYI: fix keyUsage bit checking", the patch mentioned in the Mark> bug report isn't in CVS yet (waiting for more testing).
Tom> I was wondering if we need or want that keyUsage patch as well. Tom> Do you know?
Casey seemed to think this was reasonably important, so I'm going to pull it in.
BTW, I think I have caught up on the patch backlog. At least, all the important patches that have been pointed out to me and that I didn't somehow lose have gone in.
If you know of a gcj patch needing attention, let me know and I will get it in.
Meanwhile I suppose I will go back to trying to fix pending bugs.
Tom
* Tom Tromey tromey@redhat.com [2007-03-28 12:41]:
BTW, I think I have caught up on the patch backlog. At least, all the important patches that have been pointed out to me and that I didn't somehow lose have gone in.
Jakub: can we request a new RPM spin at your earliest convenience?
Thanks,
Andrew
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org