java-sig-commits November 2014

java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org

15 participants
586 discussions

[Bug 1106170] New: maven-help-plugin: FTBFS in rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106170 Bug ID: 1106170 Summary: maven-help-plugin: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: maven-help-plugin Assignee: yyang(a)redhat.com Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: huwang(a)redhat.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, yyang(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1105908 Your package maven-help-plugin failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6953703 For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105908 [Bug 1105908] Fedora 21 Mass Rebuild FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6bzvOU1hsw&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Bug 804968] New: Put /etc/ant.d on the LOCALCLASSPATH
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '15

09 Jan '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Put /etc/ant.d on the LOCALCLASSPATH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804968 Summary: Put /etc/ant.d on the LOCALCLASSPATH Product: Fedora Version: 17 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ant AssignedTo: jcapik(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cdewolf(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: akurtako(a)redhat.com, mmatejov(a)redhat.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jcapik(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: To allow usage of antlib.xml scripts installed by other rpms /etc/ant.d must be on the LOCALCLASSPATH for ant to find these scripts. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ant-1.8.3-1.fc17.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 1107366] New: springframework-batch: FTBFS in rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jan '15

08 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107366 Bug ID: 1107366 Summary: springframework-batch: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: springframework-batch Assignee: puntogil(a)libero.it Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, msrb(a)redhat.com, puntogil(a)libero.it Blocks: 1105908 Your package springframework-batch failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7007234 For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105908 [Bug 1105908] Fedora 21 Mass Rebuild FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ox9lYs2MgA&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 11

[Bug 1093277] New: CVE-2014-0364 smack: IQ response spoofing [fedora-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Dec '14

29 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093277 Bug ID: 1093277 Summary: CVE-2014-0364 smack: IQ response spoofing [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: smack Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: puntogil(a)libero.it Reporter: mmcallis(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, puntogil(a)libero.it Blocks: 1093276 (CVE-2014-0364) This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of Fedora. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, use the bodhi submission link noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the Bodhi notes field when available. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093276 [Bug 1093276] CVE-2014-0364 smack: IQ response spoofing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5tK249Hde4&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Bug 1091042] New: mybatis 3.2.7 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Dec '14

26 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091042 Bug ID: 1091042 Summary: mybatis 3.2.7 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: mybatis Assignee: puntogil(a)libero.it Reporter: puntogil(a)libero.it QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, puntogil(a)libero.it Upstream released mybatis 3.2.7. Currently, we still have version 3.2.2 in Rawhide. Consider updating. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ndLgv7IVEy&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

[Bug 1155477] New: httpcomponents-core-4.3.3 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '14

17 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155477 Bug ID: 1155477 Summary: httpcomponents-core-4.3.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: httpcomponents-core Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jerboaa(a)gmail.com, krzysztof.daniel(a)gmail.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msimacek(a)redhat.com, msrb(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 4.3.3 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 4.3.2-3.fc21 URL: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpcomponents/httpcore/source/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Soon this service will be implemented by a new system: https://github.com/fedora-infra/anitya/ It will require to manage monitored projects via a new web interface. Please make yourself familiar with the new system to ease the transition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wbQudZ1dZH&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 1

[Bug 1048608] New: Tomcat console output is not going to ${CATALINA_BASE}/logs/catalina.out
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048608 Bug ID: 1048608 Summary: Tomcat console output is not going to ${CATALINA_BASE}/logs/catalina.out Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: tomcat Severity: high Assignee: ivan.afonichev(a)gmail.com Reporter: karthic_babu(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: akurtako(a)redhat.com, ivan.afonichev(a)gmail.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, krzysztof.daniel(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Tomcat console output (System.out and System.err) are not going to ${CATALINA_BASE}/logs/catalina.out. As per Apache Tomcat documentation (http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/logging.html#Console), console messages go to ${CATALINA_BASE}/logs/catalina.out Previous versions of fedora outputs to /usr/share/tomcat/logs/catalina.out Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: All times Steps to Reproduce: 1. Develop a simple tomcat web application. Add debug statements in servlet that prints to System.out or System.err. 2. Deploy it to tomcat server on Fedora 20 and start the tomcat server 3. Invoke the servlet. Actual results: No file appears /usr/share/tomcat/logs/catalina.out Expected results: Debug statements put on System.out and System.err shall appear in file /usr/share/tomcat/logs/catalina.out Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b9abB1daz3&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Bug 973304] New: javapackages-tools: fail build if there is a subpackage with pom file but no depmap
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '14

14 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973304 Bug ID: 973304 Summary: javapackages-tools: fail build if there is a subpackage with pom file but no depmap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: javapackages-tools Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: sochotni(a)redhat.com Reporter: sochotni(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msrb(a)redhat.com, sochotni(a)redhat.com, tradej(a)redhat.com javapackages-tools should fail build if there is a subpackage with pom file but no depmap. This would catch problems with wrong depmap file placement early on for most common cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mRDzx6ZQbm&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Bug 1132224] New: java-functions cannot handle spaces in flags/options
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '14

14 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132224 Bug ID: 1132224 Summary: java-functions cannot handle spaces in flags/options Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: javapackages-tools Assignee: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com Reporter: ctubbsii-fedora(a)apache.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msimacek(a)redhat.com, msrb(a)redhat.com Description of problem: set_flags and set_options in /usr/share/java-utils/java-functions cannot handle options with spaces. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): javapackages-tools-4.1.0-2.fc21.noarch (probably affects other versions as well) How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create an application script (using %jpackage_script maybe) 2. Observe the generated script Actual results: There's a few issues. First, the generated output for %jpackage_script assigns the variables BASE_FLAGS and BASE_OPTIONS as strings instead of arrays. (This probably also affects BASE_JARS, but the nature of that limits the likelihood that it will contain individual elements with spaces.) Second, the $BASE_FLAGS and $BASE_OPTIONS are passed as arguments to set_flags and set_options functions, respectively, without passing as arrays. Third, the set_flags and set_options functions themselves flatten their arguments to a string for use later when passing to the $JAVA_CMD. Fourth, internal values of $OPTIONS and $FLAGS are passed to $JAVA_CMD as a string. This is a big limitation, because some arguments may have spaces, such as "-XX:OnOutOfMemoryError=kill -9 %s", which does not seem to be capable of properly quoting/escaping to pass all the way through to the exec line. Expected results: The arguments should be carried as arrays throughout, so they can be properly passed to the $JAVA_CMD. Example: BASE_FLAGS=("%5") # (assuming %5 is the rpm argument) set_flags "${BASE_FLAGS[@]}" set_flags() { FLAGS=("$@") } exec $JAVA_CMD "${FLAGS[@]}" ... Additional info: When used with %jpackage_script, one cannot put spaces into arguments in the first place... unless one defines a macro. This is a limitation of rpm, but the macro is a reasonable workaround. I could not find an upstream issue tracker or bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qQdKr31DKb&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Bug 1094583] New: javapackages-tools: mvn_artifact: Empty version encountered in dependency
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '14

14 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094583 Bug ID: 1094583 Summary: javapackages-tools: mvn_artifact: Empty version encountered in dependency Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: javapackages-tools Assignee: msrb(a)redhat.com Reporter: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msimacek(a)redhat.com, msrb(a)redhat.com Description of problem: mvn_artifact fails with the following error: + python /usr/share/java-utils/mvn_artifact.py output/dist/lib/asm-analysis-5.0.2.pom output/dist/lib/asm-analysis-5.0.2.jar Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/java-utils/mvn_artifact.py", line 183, in <module> deps.extend([x for x in p.get_dependencies()]) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/javapackages/pom.py", line 181, in get_dependencies adep = Dependency.from_xml_element(dep, create_all=get_all) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/javapackages/artifact.py", line 566, in from_xml_element format(dep=a.get_mvn_str())) javapackages.artifact.ArtifactFormatException: Empty version encountered in dependency: org.ow2.asm:asm-tree Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.6.0-0.244.git9f2cc08 How reproducible: Build objectweb-asm 5.0.2-1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=88m9MkwoZP&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
59
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

java-sig-commits November 2014