https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262238
Bug ID: 1262238
Summary: gradle: Add manual page
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: gradle
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mgoldman(a)redhat.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
msimacek(a)redhat.com, mspaulding06(a)gmail.com,
msrb(a)redhat.com
It would be good to add manpage for gradle command.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h9YtqUmhDG&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
java-sig-commits mailing list
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproje…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321791
Bug ID: 1321791
Summary: CVE-2016-3674 XStream: enabled processing of external
entities [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: xstream
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: msrb(a)redhat.com
Reporter: anemec(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msimacek(a)redhat.com,
msrb(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 1321789 (CVE-2016-3674)
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only
one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at
the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other,
you may clone this bug as appropriate.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321789
[Bug 1321789] CVE-2016-3674 XStream: enabled processing of external
entities
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321401
Bug ID: 1321401
Summary: Missing dependency: findutils
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: javapackages-tools
Severity: high
Assignee: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ishitatsuyuki(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mat.booth(a)redhat.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
msimacek(a)redhat.com, msrb(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
JPackage heavily relies on findutils, but it isn't depending on it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Possibly all
How reproducible:
Using the docker container, many java things will break if you didn't noticed
this problem.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try docker for minimal package set
2. This time I was using zanata-client
3. It doesn't generate correct CLASSPATH and fail to start
Actual results:
Java applications failed to start complaining cannot load main class.
Expected results:
Application successfully starting.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310364
Bug ID: 1310364
Summary: lucene-5.5.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: lucene
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: akurtako(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: akurtako(a)redhat.com,
eclipse-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jerboaa(a)gmail.com, krzysztof.daniel(a)gmail.com,
msimacek(a)redhat.com, puntogil(a)libero.it,
rgrunber(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 5.5.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.4.1-3.fc24
URL: http://lucene.apache.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283736
Bug ID: 1283736
Summary: nosync i686 can not be installed on from x86_64 system
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: nosync
Assignee: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
Reporter: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msimacek(a)redhat.com,
msrb(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When trying to upgrade from f21 to f22 I had to remove nosync.i686 before
system-upgrade would complete. After the upgrade finished I attempted a:
dnf install nosync.i686
but no package was found.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nosync-1.0-2.fc22.i686
Additional info:
It seems that the i686 package is not available in the x86_64 repository for
some reason. I was able to install the i686 build from koji that matches the
NVR of x86_64.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UCUZ7p57It&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193307
Bug ID: 1193307
Summary: tomcat: do not provide javax.el:el-api
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: tomcat
Assignee: ivan.afonichev(a)gmail.com
Reporter: msrb(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ivan.afonichev(a)gmail.com,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
krzysztof.daniel(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
tomcat currently provides, among others, mvn(javax.el:el-api). The problem is
that the glassfish-el-api provides it as well. This causes other packages fail
to build, if both tomcat and glassfish-el-api happen to be in the buildroot. I
think that glassfish-el-api should be the one providing javax.el:el-api, as it
is a reference implementation of EL.
Java packaging guidelines should be updated as well.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tomcat-8.0.18-1.fc23
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kgtemPVawE&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275172
Bug ID: 1275172
Summary: bouncycastle-pkix-1.53 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: bouncycastle-pkix
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: puntogil(a)libero.it
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de, msrb(a)redhat.com,
puntogil(a)libero.it
Latest upstream release: 1.53
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.52-7.fc24
URL: http://www.bouncycastle.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KfjLMpscWf&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271243
Bug ID: 1271243
Summary: groovy-lib has unnecessary requires
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: groovy
Assignee: msrb(a)redhat.com
Reporter: msimacek(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msrb(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I think the groovy-lib subpackage was introduced to allow packages that use
groovy as embedded language to depend on it without pulling in a ton of
dependencies. But as of now, groovy-lib still pulls in ant, junit, testng etc.,
which I believe are not needed (are optional).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
groovy-lib-0:2.4.5-1.fc24.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. repoquery --requires groovy-lib
Actual results:
java-headless
jpackage-utils
mvn(bsf:bsf)
mvn(com.beust:jcommander)
mvn(com.thoughtworks.qdox:qdox)
mvn(commons-logging:commons-logging)
mvn(jline:jline)
mvn(junit:junit)
mvn(org.apache.ant:ant)
mvn(org.apache.ant:ant-antlr)
mvn(org.apache.ant:ant-junit)
mvn(org.apache.ant:ant-launcher)
mvn(org.testng:testng)
Expected results:
no requires on ant, junit, etc.
Additional info:
On the other hand, I'd expect objectweb-asm to be among requires, as that is
what groovy uses internally, isn't it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FVkBniC3y2&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312521
Bug ID: 1312521
Summary: httpcomponents-client-4.5.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: httpcomponents-client
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jerboaa(a)gmail.com, krzysztof.daniel(a)gmail.com,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msimacek(a)redhat.com,
msrb(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 4.5.2
Current version/release in rawhide: 4.5.1-4.fc24
URL: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpcomponents/httpclient/source/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318072
Bug ID: 1318072
Summary: jetty-9.3.8.v20160314 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: jetty
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eclipse-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
krzysztof.daniel(a)gmail.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
msimacek(a)redhat.com, msrb(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 9.3.8.v20160314
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.3.8-0.1RC0.fc25
URL: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/jetty-project/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/1447/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.