https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
Bug ID: 1074674 Summary: enable easymock module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: powermock Severity: medium Assignee: rkennke@redhat.com Reporter: pmackinn@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org, jerboaa@gmail.com, neugens@redhat.com, rkennke@redhat.com
$ rpm -q easymock easymock-3.2-2.fc21.noarch
The latest version of powermock in rawhide appears to build with the latest version of easymock.
Without the api/pom.xml patch:
[INFO] powermock ......................................... SUCCESS [13.682s] [INFO] powermock-reflect ................................. SUCCESS [8.658s] [INFO] powermock-core .................................... SUCCESS [7.167s] [INFO] powermock-api ..................................... SUCCESS [0.031s] [INFO] powermock-api-support ............................. SUCCESS [3.025s] [INFO] powermock-api-easymock ............................ SUCCESS [4.883s] [INFO] powermock-api-mockito ............................. SUCCESS [4.806s] [INFO] powermock-modules ................................. SUCCESS [0.013s]
<snip>
./api/easymock/target/powermock-api-easymock-1.4.12.jar ./api/easymock/target/powermock-api-easymock-1.4.12-javadoc.jar ./api/easymock/target/powermock-api-easymock-1.4.12-sources.jar
Please consider enabling this module and providing a sub-package for same.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
Michael Simacek msimacek@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |msimacek@redhat.com Assignee|rkennke@redhat.com |msimacek@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- powermock-1.4.12-10.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powermock-1.4.12-10.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- Package powermock-1.4.12-10.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing powermock-1.4.12-10.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-4488/powermock-1.4.12-10... then log in and leave karma (feedback).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |powermock-1.4.12-10.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2014-04-09 09:15:51
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- powermock-1.4.12-10.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
Christopher Tubbs ctubbsii@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ctubbsii@apache.org
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Tubbs ctubbsii@apache.org --- The 1.4 version, and some of the 1.5 versions of powermock (using PowerMockRunner and expectNew) don't work with EasyMock 3.2, (http://code.google.com/p/powermock/issues/detail?id=454)
This issue appears fixed by PowerMock 1.5.4. Do I need to create a separate issue?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Tubbs ctubbsii@apache.org --- Filed bz#1096992
java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org