Re: oxygen disappeared
by Rex Dieter
On 07/08/2014 12:08 PM, Colin J Thomson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon 7 July 2014 11:41:42 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
>
>> kde-style-oxygen-4.11.10-7.fc20.x86_64 is installed on my system.
>>
>> However, it seems to have disappeared from my choices in:
>>
>> System Settings -> Application Appearance -> Style -> Widget Style
>
> Not much help but it shows up on this F20 box running 4.13.2
Try removing the
[Qt%20Plugin%20Cache%204.8.false]
[Qt%20Factory%20Cache%204.8]
sections from ~/.config/Trolltech.conf
or remove that file altogether. The Cache entries seem to get corrupted
from time to time.
-- Rex
9 years, 9 months
oxygen disappeared
by Eli Wapniarski
Hi..
kde-style-oxygen-4.11.10-7.fc20.x86_64 is installed on my system.
However, it seems to have disappeared from my choices in:
System Settings -> Application Appearance -> Style -> Widget Style
Eli
9 years, 9 months
mask udisks2.service and upower.service
by Reindl Harald
for rsyslog it is possible to supress such messages:
:msg, contains, "udisks2.service" ~
:msg, contains, "upower.service" ~
but using kate on machines which are a buildserver where
it is fine to work with kate on SPEC files over SSH
especially on virtual machines it spits permanently
in the terminal
is it not possible to explain the software "yes i
have masked that because it is not neededso don't
tell me that again and again"
______________________________________________________
[root@testserver:~]$ kate
Object::connect: No such signal QDBusAbstractInterface::DeviceAdded(QString)
Object::connect: No such signal QDBusAbstractInterface::DeviceRemoved(QString)
Object::connect: No such signal QDBusAbstractInterface::DeviceAdded(QDBusObjectPath)
Object::connect: No such signal QDBusAbstractInterface::DeviceRemoved(QDBusObjectPath)
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects: "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Masked"
"Unit udisks2.service is masked."
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects: "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Masked"
"Unit udisks2.service is masked."
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects: "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Masked"
"Unit udisks2.service is masked."
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects: "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Masked"
"Unit udisks2.service is masked."
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects: "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Masked"
"Unit udisks2.service is masked."
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects: "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Masked"
"Unit udisks2.service is masked."
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects: "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Masked"
"Unit udisks2.service is masked."
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects: "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Masked"
"Unit udisks2.service is masked."
9 years, 9 months
Is it now "safe" to use the kde-redhat unstable repo?
by Valerio Mariani
Dear All,
I am Valerio, a recent Fedora convert. Until now I only used Gnome 3
with Fedora, but I would like now to change to KDE, an old love of mine.
I understand that currently the kde-redhat unstable repo provides
packages for kde 4.13.1, as opposed to the 4.12.x packages in the
official repos.
I was concerned, after reading the last emails on this list, about
conflicts for the workspace packages. I understand that in both
repositories the plasma workspace is pinned (as upstream) at version
4.11... However, the packages in kde-redhat are compiled against baloo
(used in 4.13), while the ones in the official repos are compiled
against nepomunk (used in 4.12).
I read, however, that the packages in the official repo have sometimes
higher version number and get installed in place of the the ones in
kde-redhat.
My question is: is it safe at this point to use the kde-redhat unstable
repositories on top of the official ones, or will I end up with a
Frankenstein, half nepomunk, half baloo system?
Thank you for your help!
Valerio
9 years, 9 months
Re: Is it now "safe" to use the kde-redhat unstable repo?
by Rex Dieter
On 07/01/2014 10:57 AM, Valerio Mariani wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am Valerio, a recent Fedora convert. Until now I only used Gnome 3
> with Fedora, but I would like now to change to KDE, an old love of mine.
>
> I understand that currently the kde-redhat unstable repo provides
> packages for kde 4.13.1, as opposed to the 4.12.x packages in the
> official repos.
...
> My question is: is it safe at this point to use the kde-redhat unstable
> repositories on top of the official ones, or will I end up with a
> Frankenstein, half nepomunk, half baloo system?
They are safe'ish. kde-unstable will soon hold what we plan on soon
moving to kde-testing and official updates-testing repositories.
See also:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-July/200690.html
-- Rex
9 years, 9 months
