Il 07/08/2016 14:35, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
In my prior post, I included chromium in the list of browser
candidates. If
you're not familiar with it, it is essentially a free version of google
chrome that recently made it's way into fedora package repositories.
Advantages and features include:
* based on same rendering engine as qtwebengine (that qupzilla uses)
* has active, well-supported upstream
* some kde integration: kde file dialogs, kwallet for secrets
* supports most chrome addons/extensions
Disadvantages include:
* pretty new to fedora (only a few weeks)
* packaging/buildsystem is... messy and fragile (not unique here,
qtwebengine suffers similarly but less so)
* not 100% native (like qupzilla)
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@lists.fedoraproject.org I think
many people are casting here their personal preferences instead
of focusing on what should be the real point: what's the browser between
Firefox, Chromium and Qupzilla that really integrates in KDE and
requires the less dependencies being installed over a clean KDE spin
installation?
I think the right choice between them must not force the installation of
other requirements but the main QT / KF5 components. Personal
considerations about missing functions should not be thrown in the
discussion: if someone prefer one browser to another can easily install
it over the main installation.
Trying to install Qupzilla and Chromium on my workstation (which is
**not** a clean KDE installation and *I already have Firefox installed*,
so probably I already have many GTK stuff installed that is required by
Chromium), gives me:
# dnf install chromium
Ultima verifica della scadenza dei metadati: 0:00:54 fa il Wed Aug 10
17:55:35 2016.
Dipendenze risolte.
================================================================================
Package Arch Versione Repository Dim.
================================================================================
Installazione in corso:
chromium x86_64 52.0.2743.82-9.fc24 updates 37 M
chromium-libs x86_64 52.0.2743.82-9.fc24 updates 38 M
libcanberra-gtk2 x86_64 0.30-11.fc24 fedora 30 k
re2 x86_64 20160401-2.fc24 fedora 174 k
u2f-hidraw-policy x86_64 1.0.2-2.fc24 fedora 22 k
Riepilogo della transazione
================================================================================
Installati 5 pacchetti
Dimensione totale dello scaricamento: 76 M
Dimensione installata: 269 M
# dnf install qupzilla
Ultima verifica della scadenza dei metadati: 0:02:07 fa il Wed Aug 10
17:55:35 2016.
Dipendenze risolte.
================================================================================
Package Arch Versione Repository
Dim.
================================================================================
Installazione in corso:
protobuf x86_64 2.6.1-4.fc24 fedora 356 k
qt5-qtwebengine x86_64 5.6.1-3.fc24 updates 28 M
qtlockedfile-qt5 x86_64 2.4-21.20150629git5a07df5.fc24 fedora
35 k
qtsingleapplication-qt5 x86_64 2.6.1-28.fc24 fedora 43 k
qupzilla x86_64 2.0.1-1.fc24 updates 2.5 M
re2 x86_64 20160401-2.fc24 fedora 174 k
Riepilogo della transazione
================================================================================
Installati 6 pacchetti
Dimensione totale dello scaricamento: 31 M
Dimensione installata: 105 M
Given these outputs I vote for Qupzilla because it does not require GTK
stuff and it weights less than a half compared to Chromium (I'm thinking
to live images).
Mattia