On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@chello.at> wrote:
Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Might as well wait for Falkon to be available and deal with Konqueror and
> the default issue at the same time.

It's already available, just not called Falkon yet. I don't see why that
even matters at all.


Splitting this out into a separate thread.

Yeah, I suppose it's a distinction without a difference - but I could imagine how people who don't follow these things could get confused with the name change.  

In any event, doesn't hurt to wait a bit for them to get the changes done and to target this for F28 and then to handle konqueror at the same time.

I believe at this point it's not why this should happen, but rather why not.  Falkon is a full featured browser, showcases qtwebengine, has many extensions, etc.  It's just the logical thing to do.