Hi
Like Kate, Kompare seems to be missing too. Rex told me that Kate was part of 'kdesdk' group, which I chose not to install. But I had 'KDE software development' selected in Anaconda's package list.
Anyway, I could manually install kate since its available as an independent package. But I couldn't locate kompare as an independent package. After a bit of searching, I found it as 'kdesdk-kompare'. In the process I found Okteta as kdesdk-okteta - already installed on my machine.
So, couple of doubts - when I select 'kde software development': 1. kate is a separate package - not installed by default 2. kompare is listed as kdesdk-kompare - not installed by default 3. Okteta, listed as kdesdk-okteta, surprisingly is installed by default!
How about having the base applications marked 'mandatory' when 'KDE software development' is selected?
regards,
Syam
Sonic wrote:
Like Kate, Kompare seems to be missing too. Rex told me that Kate was part of 'kdesdk' group, which I chose not to install. But I had 'KDE software development' selected in Anaconda's package list.
Anyway, I could manually install kate since its available as an independent package. But I couldn't locate kompare as an independent package. After a bit of searching, I found it as 'kdesdk-kompare'. In the process I found Okteta as kdesdk-okteta - already installed on my machine.
So, couple of doubts - when I select 'kde software development':
- kate is a separate package - not installed by default
- kompare is listed as kdesdk-kompare - not installed by default
- Okteta, listed as kdesdk-okteta, surprisingly is installed by default!
all of those are installed by default in 'kde-software-development'. Do recall that as part of debugging this, you mentioned choosing to omit 'kdesdk', which would've pulled all of these in.
(okteta is pulled in indirectly via kdevelop too, which probably explains how you got it)
-- rex
Rex Dieter wrote:
all of those are installed by default in 'kde-software-development'. Do recall that as part of debugging this, you mentioned choosing to omit 'kdesdk', which would've pulled all of these in.
For Fedora 17, we should probably list the subpackages individually instead (and the stuff which is in the kdesdk main package needs to move to 1 or 2 subpackages, it's supposed to be an empty metapackage).
Kevin Kofler