Re: plasma software update trouble

[Rex Dieter]

OK, whatever repo that is providing vivaldi-beta, either doesn't sign their rpms, or you have not yet imported the key used to sign it

Evidence so far:  not a bug

-- Rex

________________________________________
From: Neal Becker 
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 9:23 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: plasma software update trouble

It's just 1 package: vivaldi-beta
dnf doesn't show any update, must be using different metadata.

plasma software update trouble

[Neal Becker]

I disagree - going into an infinite loop while providing no useful 
information is a bug in my opinion

Rex Dieter wrote:
> OK, whatever repo that is providing vivaldi-beta, either doesn't sign
> their rpms, or you have not yet imported the key used to sign it
>
> Evidence so far:  not a bug
>
> -- Rex
>
> From: Neal Becker 
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 9:23 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: plasma software update trouble
>
> It's just 1 package: vivaldi-beta
> dnf doesn't show any update, must be using different metadata.

plasma software update trouble

[Reindl Harald]

Am 17.12.2015 um 16:44 schrieb Neal Becker:
> I disagree - going into an infinite loop while providing no useful
> information is a bug in my opinion

nonsense - wrong configured or unsigned 3rd party repos are not a 
problem of Fedora and you have enough tools like "dnf info vivaldi-beta"
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> > OK, whatever repo that is providing vivaldi-beta, either doesn't sign
> > their rpms, or you have not yet imported the key used to sign it
> >
> > Evidence so far:  not a bug