On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user switching - that is, switching between multiple active desktop sessions for different users, without logging out and in - as release-blocking?
Workstation WG agrees that user switching should be release blocking. We trust QA will write the specific release criterion.
Obvious thing to do would be to resurrect kparal's old draft. So, KDE team, since we'll be blocking on this for GNOME, do you want us to include KDE too or make it Workstation-only? Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user switching - that is, switching between multiple active desktop sessions for different users, without logging out and in - as release-blocking?
Workstation WG agrees that user switching should be release blocking. We trust QA will write the specific release criterion.
Obvious thing to do would be to resurrect kparal's old draft. So, KDE team, since we'll be blocking on this for GNOME, do you want us to include KDE too or make it Workstation-only? Thanks!
I believe Rex mentioned earlier in the thread[1] that it should include KDE. As a member of both Workstation WG and KDE SIG, I support this.
[1]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@lists.fedoraproject.org/me...
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 12:04 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user switching - that is, switching between multiple active desktop sessions for different users, without logging out and in - as release-blocking?
Workstation WG agrees that user switching should be release blocking. We trust QA will write the specific release criterion.
Obvious thing to do would be to resurrect kparal's old draft. So, KDE team, since we'll be blocking on this for GNOME, do you want us to include KDE too or make it Workstation-only? Thanks!
I believe Rex mentioned earlier in the thread[1] that it should include KDE. As a member of both Workstation WG and KDE SIG,
*record scratch*
wait, is that even legal?!
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:05 PM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 12:04 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user switching - that is, switching between multiple active desktop sessions for different users, without logging out and in - as release-blocking?
Workstation WG agrees that user switching should be release blocking. We trust QA will write the specific release criterion.
Obvious thing to do would be to resurrect kparal's old draft. So, KDE team, since we'll be blocking on this for GNOME, do you want us to include KDE too or make it Workstation-only? Thanks!
I believe Rex mentioned earlier in the thread[1] that it should include KDE. As a member of both Workstation WG and KDE SIG,
*record scratch*
wait, is that even legal?!
Well, I hope so! I replaced Rex as the KDE guy on the Workstation WG last year... :)
It's been a fun experience so far, we'll see how far I can take it. :D
-
Adam Williamson -
Neal Gompa