✅ PASS: Test report for 6.9.5-100.fc39 (fedora-latest)
by cki-project＠redhat.com
Hi, we tested your kernel and here are the results:
Overall result: PASSED
Merge: OK
Compile: OK
Test: OK
Tested-by: CKI Project <cki-project(a)redhat.com>
Kernel information:
Brew / Koji Task ID: 119103030
You can find all the details about the test run at
https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/checkouts/redhat:koji-119103030
If you find a failure unrelated to your changes, please ask the test maintainer to review it.
This will prevent the failures from being incorrectly reported in the future.
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
1 day, 17 hours
✅ PASS (MISSED 6 of 111): Test report for 6.9.4-100.fc39 (fedora-latest)
by cki-project＠redhat.com
Hi, we tested your kernel and here are the results:
Overall result: PASSED
Merge: OK
Compile: OK
Test: OK
Tested-by: CKI Project <cki-project(a)redhat.com>
Kernel information:
Brew / Koji Task ID: 118918715
You can find all the details about the test run at
https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/checkouts/redhat:koji-118918715
Tests that were not ran because of internal issues:
Boot test [ppc64le]
CKI/restraint [ppc64le]
machineinfo [ppc64le]
Reboot test [ppc64le]
SELinux Custom Module Setup [ppc64le]
selinux-policy: serge-testsuite [ppc64le]
If you find a failure unrelated to your changes, please ask the test maintainer to review it.
This will prevent the failures from being incorrectly reported in the future.
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
5 days, 18 hours
Building upstream kernel with Fedora config
by Mikhail Gavrilov
Hi,
Instruction [1] about building upstream kernel should be updated,
because since commit 5e6abd7f4dce [2] the Fedora kernel config contain
CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS="certs/rhel.pem" and this is lead to build
error:
HOSTCC /home/mikhail/packaging-work/git/linux/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/ctype.o
HOSTCC /home/mikhail/packaging-work/git/linux/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/str_error_r.o
HOSTLD /home/mikhail/packaging-work/git/linux/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids-in.o
LINK resolve_btfids
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'certs/rhel.pem', needed by
'certs/x509_certificate_list'. Stop.
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
I always use Fedora current kernel config for bisecting upstream kernel.
Not sure if my solution is right. But for a quick workaround I decided
to remove CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS value.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BuildingUpstreamKernel
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/c/5e6abd7f4dce6f47a9f6df3919ee0...
> diff /boot/config-6.10.0-0.rc1.20240531git4a4be1ad3a6e.22.fc41.x86_64+debug /boot/config-6.10.0-0.rc1.20240529gite0cce98fe279.20.fc41.x86_64+debug
3c3
< # Linux/x86_64
6.10.0-0.rc1.20240531git4a4be1ad3a6e.22.fc41.x86_64+debug Kernel
Configuration
---
> # Linux/x86_64 6.10.0-0.rc1.20240529gite0cce98fe279.20.fc41.x86_64+debug Kernel Configuration
36c36
< CONFIG_BUILD_SALT="6.10.0-0.rc1.20240531git4a4be1ad3a6e.22.fc41.x86_64"
---
> CONFIG_BUILD_SALT="6.10.0-0.rc1.20240529gite0cce98fe279.20.fc41.x86_64"
10745c10745
< CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS="certs/rhel.pem"
---
> CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS=""
--
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.
1 week, 4 days
kernel-6.9.3 with Luks reverting to text boot
by Ian Laurie
I'm getting repeatable text boots using kernel-6.9.3 with Luks.
Previous 6.9.1 and 6.9.2 was OK.
Intel NUC NUC13ANHi7 (NUC13ANHi7000) (rev N11225-207) 1 x 13th Gen
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1360P
Intel Corporation Raptor Lake-P [Iris Xe Graphics] (rev 04)
This is the only platform I have that is using luks to encrypt the SSD,
so I don't know how widespread this is.
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
2 weeks, 2 days
