Am 05.03.2014 17:28, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
Don Zickus <dzickus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Also, I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start higher,
> say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-)
This entire disk size optimization seems kind of weird to me.
in case of kernel agreed
in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance
I just booted a f20 offiical cloud image in our openstack cloud. I
used
the m1.tiny (smallest size, no persistent storage):
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda1 20G 1.1G 19G 6% /
way too fat and i even regret the 5.8 GB rootfs on 30 instances
but was unsure in 2008 how much reservation would be needed
[root@proxy:~]$ df
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 ext4 5.8G 681M 5.1G 12% /
/dev/sda1 ext4 493M 34M 460M 7% /boot