On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:16 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hughes
> You really don't want to be using
> USERSPACE at all.
seems like cpufreq-applet uses it....
Sure, it shouldn't. If you're using userspace for thermal or latency
reasons, then a setuid applet is totally the wrong way to achieve both
of these :-)
Maybe we can just use these as loadable modules (i.e. not built default)
rather than built-in and loaded by default.
DaveJ, do these suggestions seem acceptable?