On Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:54:07 pm Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:49:28 pm Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008 08:58:00 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > On 25.03.2008 13:47, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 25 March 2008 02:02:04 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > >> On 24.03.2008 20:53, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > >>> On Monday 24 March 2008 03:32:37 pm Dave Jones wrote:
> > >>>> I took a stab at bz 197065 and arrived at the patch below.
> > >>>> Would appreciate some eyeballs before I commit from people
> > >>>> familiar with the macro goo in the specfile. (Hi Roland!)
[...]
> Test build up and running:
>
> [root@xenon x86_64]# ls /boot/*.x86_64*
> /boot/config-2.6.25-0.152.rc6.git7.fc9.x86_64
> /boot/initrd-2.6.25-0.152.rc6.git7.fc9.x86_64.img
> /boot/System.map-2.6.25-0.152.rc6.git7.fc9.x86_64
> /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.25-0.152.rc6.git7.fc9.x86_64
>
> [root@xenon x86_64]# uname -r
> 2.6.25-0.152.rc6.git7.fc9.x86_64
>
> [root@xenon x86_64]# ls /lib/modules/
> 2.6.25-0.152.rc6.git7.fc9.x86_64
>
> [root@xenon x86_64]# ls /usr/src/kernels/
> 2.6.25-0.152.rc6.git7.fc9.x86_64
And here's the patch I came up with for the above:
Crap, disregard that version. Things blow up on flavo{,u}red builds, because
the flavo{,u}r gets inserted between the f9 and .arch instead of after arch
(the ppc64 build blew up on kdump bits). So a teeny bit more spec hackage
required, but its still doable.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson(a)redhat.com