Hi,
On 29-07-15 17:06, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Josh Boyer
<jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> On 07/28/2014 07:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> commit e6fe382d1d53d4cdf9b544729dc823d4eab0217c
>>> Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org>
>>> Date: Mon Jul 28 13:03:01 2014 -0400
>>>
>>> Make sure acpi brightness_switch is disabled (like forever in Fedora)
>>>
>>> Upstream reverted the change to turn the ACPI brightness_switch_enabled
>>> parameter off by default. Revert the revert so we go back to the state
>>> Fedora has traditionally been in.
>>
>> Ack, I was planning on doing this myself but you beat me to it, thanks for
>> taking care of this.
>>
>> Note that 3.17 will have this patch:
>>
>>
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?...
>>
>> Which fixes the 2 steps being taken for one keypress problem while
>> keeping the acpi brightness_switch behavior enabled, so that people who
>> have an acpi-video controlled backlight and a userspace which does not
>> do backlight control (e.g. windowmaker).
>>
>> So for 3.17 we should IMHO drop the revert-revert and stick with
>> upstream behavior.
>
> OK.
Oops. The revert-revert patch was never actually dropped so long ago.
So we're still defaulting the ACPI brightness_switch_enabled parameter
off by default in Fedora.
If you still believe we should drop it
Yes I still believe we should drop it, the kernel has had a workaround
for the double brightness changes this used to cause for quite some
while now, and the closer to upstream we are the better IMHO.
Regards,
Hans