Re: New package naming scheme

[Marcelo Ricardo Leitner]

Em 01-05-2014 00:14, Chuck Anderson escreveu:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:04:05AM +0200, poma wrote:
> > There is a discrepancy in the terminology of these two packages:
> > kernel-drivers[1]
> > kernel-modules-extra
> >
> > Are these[1] modules passed the driving test?
> > Should I read the "Banana Split" thread, again?
> > Perhaps the "kernel-modules" for the "kernel-drivers" is the proper name.
>
> I should have brought that up when the split was first proposed, but I
> agree and I do not like this inconsistency.  The new one should be
> called kernel-modules, or the old kernel-modules-extra should be
> renamed kernel-drivers-extra.

I vote for kernel-modules and kernel-modules-extra, as not all modules 
are drivers.

Marcelo