On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 02:22:11 -0400
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 23:37:53 -0600
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> Finally sat down to look at moving forward on the kernel bug traging
> stuff (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage
> Some more thoughts:
> Would it be useful to add tracker bugs for [PATCH] bugs? Or is that
> easy enough to query for if you are looking for them? Should we ask
> submitters to make sure they also submit upstream?
I've been adding Keywords: Patch, but a tracker might be better.
ok. I can make one I guess. ;)
That can mean several different things:
1) A patch to our kernel.spec file or other fedora-only thing.
2) A link to an upstream patch that fixes the bug in our kernel.
3) Something meant for upstream.
Would it be useful to note witch it was? (If we can tell).
I guess easiest might be:
Or too complicated?
> Should we have any tracker for [RFE] bugs as well?
Probably not worth the trouble.
> I noticed we have:
> Bug 126342 Meta bug: custom built kernels -
> Should we close any crazy custom kernel config issues as a
> duplicate of that one?
Yes, I think that's what it's for.
I think I will see about working on the rawhide bugs this week if
possible. I already moved some of the video ones over.