Common kernel problems page

[Matthew Miller]

In helping someone with a suspend/resume problem, I came across this
page:

* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_kernel_problems

which looks awesome and super-helpful... and then I noticed that the
last edit is 2012, with the bulk of activity in 2010 or earlier.

How relevant is the content on this page today? Should it just be
trashed, or can it be savaged? I'd love to see an updated version of
this as part of the (new/upcoming) Quick Docs at
<https://docs.fedoraproject.org/quick-docs/en-US/index.html>;.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[Laura Abbott]

On 01/08/2018 12:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>  In helping someone with a suspend/resume problem, I came across this
>  page:
>  
>  * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_kernel_problems
>  
>  which looks awesome and super-helpful... and then I noticed that the
>  last edit is 2012, with the bulk of activity in 2010 or earlier.
>  
>  How relevant is the content on this page today? Should it just be
>  trashed, or can it be savaged? I'd love to see an updated version of
>  this as part of the (new/upcoming) Quick Docs at
>  <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/quick-docs/en-US/index.html>;.
>   
Some of the more generic suggestions are still useful, the hardware
specific parts probably need some updating, perhaps with new
quirks. I could see this being expanded with some other common
"here's how you get information X for problem Y" as well.

Thanks,
Laura

[Peter Robinson]

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Laura Abbott <labbott(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  On 01/08/2018 12:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> > In helping someone with a suspend/resume problem, I came across this
> > page:
> >
> > * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_kernel_problems
> >
> > which looks awesome and super-helpful... and then I noticed that the
> > last edit is 2012, with the bulk of activity in 2010 or earlier.
> >
> > How relevant is the content on this page today? Should it just be
> > trashed, or can it be savaged? I'd love to see an updated version of
> > this as part of the (new/upcoming) Quick Docs at
> > <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/quick-docs/en-US/index.html>;.
> >
>
>  Some of the more generic suggestions are still useful, the hardware
>  specific parts probably need some updating, perhaps with new
>  quirks. I could see this being expanded with some other common
>  "here's how you get information X for problem Y" as well. 
Probably useful to add some architecture bits there for the various
non x86 arches.