Compiling kernel-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.src.rpm

[Markus Kesaromous]

Still not fixed:

arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined


_________________________________________________________________
Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you.
http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCB&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_M...

[Christopher Brown]

2009/9/7 Markus Kesaromous <remotestar(a)live.com&gt;:
>  Still not fixed:
>
>  arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined 
Correct. You will see this in 2.6.31.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/14/164

Regards

-- 
Christopher Brown

[Josh Boyer]

On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 02:27:24PM -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
> Still not fixed:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined 
Please stop posting such messages here.

josh

[Markus Kesaromous]

----------------------------------------
>  Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:17:38 -0400
>  From: jwboyer(a)gmail.com
>  To: remotestar(a)live.com
>  CC: fedora-kernel-list(a)redhat.com
>  Subject: Re: Compiling kernel-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.src.rpm
>
>  On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 02:27:24PM -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
> >
> >Still not fixed:
> >
> >arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined
>
>  Please stop posting such messages here.
>
>  josh 
Why?
What gives you the right to say what gets posted or does not get posted  here ?

This is the fedora kernel list. I posted an issue with the latest fedora kernel source.

If you have a problem with that, I strongly encourage you to unsubscribe from this list.

MK


_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. 
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-U...

[Josh Boyer]

> >>Still not fixed:
> >>
> >>arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined
> >
> > Please stop posting such messages here.
> >
> > josh
>
> Why? 
Because this is not bugzilla.  Posting emails here on issues you've already
reported and are applicable to upstream isn't really going to do anything.

Bugs (like your radeon issue) should be reported in bugzilla.

josh

[Paul Bolle]

On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 22:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>  Bugs (like your radeon issue) should be reported in bugzilla. 
The radeon issue I'm familiar with was related to running a (locally
rebuild) Rawhide kernel rpm on a Fedora 11 installation. That caused
some problems with the Fedora 11 X Server radeon stuff. I don't think
bugzilla will be of much use for an issue like that.


Paul Bolle

[Christopher Brown]

2009/9/8 Markus Kesaromous <remotestar(a)live.com&gt;:
>  ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:17:38 -0400
> > From: jwboyer(a)gmail.com
> > To: remotestar(a)live.com
> > CC: fedora-kernel-list(a)redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: Compiling kernel-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.src.rpm
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 02:27:24PM -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
> >>
> >>Still not fixed:
> >>
> >>arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined
> >
> > Please stop posting such messages here.
> >
> > josh
>
>  Why?
>  What gives you the right to say what gets posted or does not get posted  here ?
>
>  This is the fedora kernel list. I posted an issue with the latest fedora kernel source.
No, you didn't. The latest fedora kernel source is found in rawhide.

>  If you have a problem with that, I strongly encourage you to
> unsubscribe from this list. 
The problem Markus is that you have already had your query responded
to and it took me a very small amount of time to discover the problem
was fixed in 2.6.31. Messages like the ones above detract from
people's time spent developing the kernel and as such you were asked
to not post messages of this nature. Please respect that -
contributions such as patches to enable the kernel to build are most
welcome however.

Regards

-- 
Christopher Brown

[Chuck Ebbert]

On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 14:27:24 -0700
Markus Kesaromous <remotestar(a)live.com&gt; wrote:

>  
>  Still not fixed:
>  
>  arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined
>  
>   
It really is just a warning, arising because the kernel gets built with -Wundef.