kernel-vanilla-2.6.26-137.fc10

[Roland McGrath]

BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/
for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26.

This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they
are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also upstream.

I think koji scratch only stays around for a couple of days.
Maybe there is a better place to put these.

Was there ever a plan to put kernel-vanilla rpms up for public consumption
on a regular basis?

Thanks,
Roland

[Dave Jones]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/
> for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26.
>
> This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they
> are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also upstream.
>
> I think koji scratch only stays around for a couple of days.
> Maybe there is a better place to put these.

put them on roland.fedoraproject.org ?
> Was there ever a plan to put kernel-vanilla rpms up for public consumption
> on a regular basis?

There was.  The question largely came down to 'where do we host them?'.
The best answer right now does seem to be $personal.fedoraproject.org
I think it's worth doing this on a semi-regular basis.
Probably not for every -git, but at least for every -rc and point release.

Dave

[Josh Boyer]

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:12 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/
> > for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26.
> >
> > This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they
> > are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also upstream.
> >
> > I think koji scratch only stays around for a couple of days.
> > Maybe there is a better place to put these.
>
> put them on roland.fedoraproject.org ?
> > Was there ever a plan to put kernel-vanilla rpms up for public consumption
> > on a regular basis?
>
> There was.  The question largely came down to 'where do we host them?'.
> The best answer right now does seem to be $personal.fedoraproject.org
> I think it's worth doing this on a semi-regular basis.
> Probably not for every -git, but at least for every -rc and point release.

I'd be more than happy to host them on my fedorapeople page.  I don't
have anything else there.

josh

[Dave Jones]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:12 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/
> > > for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26.
> > >
> > > This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they
> > > are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also upstream.
> > >
> > > I think koji scratch only stays around for a couple of days.
> > > Maybe there is a better place to put these.
> >
> > put them on roland.fedoraproject.org ?
> > > Was there ever a plan to put kernel-vanilla rpms up for public consumption
> > > on a regular basis?
> >
> > There was.  The question largely came down to 'where do we host them?'.
> > The best answer right now does seem to be $personal.fedoraproject.org
> > I think it's worth doing this on a semi-regular basis.
> > Probably not for every -git, but at least for every -rc and point release.
>
> I'd be more than happy to host them on my fedorapeople page.  I don't
> have anything else there.

I really don't mind who does it, and takes care of the building/uploading of
them (it can mostly be automated anyway).  I've not got around to doing it
myself due to well, everything else.  It's probably best if someone other
than the usual suspects (me, kyle, chuck) did it anyway, so we can keep doing
what we do normally..

Dave

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
Roland McGrath  wrote:
> BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/
> for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26.
>
> This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if
> they are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also
> upstream.

btw current fedora rawhide utrace is trather bust.. you made number 12
so far ...
http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=ptrace_report_clone