On 10/26/16 at 10:50am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Tuesday 25 October 2016 07:53 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
Moreover, with above additional two patches kexec-tools seems fine, but still fedora-kernel-arm64/devel (with fh_defconfig+kexec enabled) did not reboot on a seattle platform (Nothing after "Bye"). Will debug and come back on it.
So couple of observation and so some queries:
(a) Proposed kexec-tools patch with suggested additional patches works, but not with [1]. However, same kexec-tools did work when I used kernel from [2] which is based on 4.9-rc2. What is the kernel version that will be released in fc25? and which platform are you targeting? I can try to see the necessary diff which might cause the issue on mustang/seattle. Issue might not be related directly to kexec, and might be plat specific.
(b) With current proposed kexec-tools, it takes more than 3 min to verify sha on seattle machine. If you want to do it quick (in a second) then you might need some more kexec-tools patches which are not yet approved in upstream. They are these [3].
Pratyush, I think for (b) we can just live with it, it maybe seattle specific issues.
~Pratyush
[1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/kernel-arm64.git : devel (or master)
[2] https://github.com/pratyushanand/linux/tree/upstream_arm64_devel
[3] https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/182706c9dd2e78d7273434fd... https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/87d642cd983e68a2ca3c6d5d... https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/a9473f1124d35f5144a5b5d1... _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list -- kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kexec-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org