Pingfan Liu (2): sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on aarch64 sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on ppc64le
kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 | 2 +- kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu piliu@redhat.com --- kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 b/kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 index fedd3bc..67a2af7 100644 --- a/kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 +++ b/kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ KDUMP_COMMANDLINE_APPEND="irqpoll nr_cpus=1 reset_devices cgroup_disable=memory # # Example: # KEXEC_ARGS="--elf32-core-headers" -KEXEC_ARGS="" +KEXEC_ARGS="-s"
#Where to find the boot image #KDUMP_BOOTDIR="/boot"
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu piliu@redhat.com --- kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le b/kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le index ebb22f6..270a2cf 100644 --- a/kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le +++ b/kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ KDUMP_COMMANDLINE_APPEND="irqpoll maxcpus=1 noirqdistrib reset_devices cgroup_di # # Example: # KEXEC_ARGS="--elf32-core-headers" -KEXEC_ARGS="--dt-no-old-root" +KEXEC_ARGS="--dt-no-old-root -s"
#Where to find the boot image #KDUMP_BOOTDIR="/boot"
Gentle ping. Could you help to review it or should I resend it in case that you miss it in mailbox ?
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:18 AM Pingfan Liu piliu@redhat.com wrote:
Pingfan Liu (2): sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on aarch64 sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on ppc64le
kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 | 2 +- kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-- 2.31.1
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:52:13AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
Gentle ping. Could you help to review it or should I resend it in case that you miss it in mailbox ?
Thanks for the reminder!
For the patch set,
Acked-by: Coiby Xu coxu@redhat.com
Btw, I'm curious is there a comparison between kexec_file_load and kexec_load. For example, what's the advantage of using kexec_load if we needn't to verify the signature of the kernel image?
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:18 AM Pingfan Liu piliu@redhat.com wrote:
Pingfan Liu (2): sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on aarch64 sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on ppc64le
kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 | 2 +- kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-- 2.31.1
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:41 PM Coiby Xu coxu@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:52:13AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
Gentle ping. Could you help to review it or should I resend it in case that you miss it in mailbox ?
Thanks for the reminder!
For the patch set,
Acked-by: Coiby Xu coxu@redhat.com
Btw, I'm curious is there a comparison between kexec_file_load and kexec_load. For example, what's the advantage of using kexec_load if we needn't to verify the signature of the kernel image?
The kexe_file_load resolves the concern of safety. So the verification of signatures is the heart of the whole thing.
For performance etc, according to my understanding, no significant difference.
Thanks,
Pingfan
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:18 AM Pingfan Liu piliu@redhat.com wrote:
Pingfan Liu (2): sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on aarch64 sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on ppc64le
kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 | 2 +- kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-- 2.31.1
-- Best regards, Coiby
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 04:01:54PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:41 PM Coiby Xu coxu@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:52:13AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
Gentle ping. Could you help to review it or should I resend it in case that you miss it in mailbox ?
Thanks for the reminder!
For the patch set,
Acked-by: Coiby Xu coxu@redhat.com
Btw, I'm curious is there a comparison between kexec_file_load and kexec_load. For example, what's the advantage of using kexec_load if we needn't to verify the signature of the kernel image?
The kexe_file_load resolves the concern of safety. So the verification of signatures is the heart of the whole thing.
For performance etc, according to my understanding, no significant difference.
Thanks for the explanation!
Thanks,
Pingfan
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:18 AM Pingfan Liu piliu@redhat.com wrote:
Pingfan Liu (2): sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on aarch64 sysconfig: make kexec_file_load as default option on ppc64le
kdump.sysconfig.aarch64 | 2 +- kdump.sysconfig.ppc64le | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-- 2.31.1
-- Best regards, Coiby