-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi
I own an Asus Zenbook UX32. F18 64Bit is running great on this machine. On thing in strange: The battery capacity seems to be less than running Windows 8 on that Ultrabook.
I investigated this behaviour. I think, this issue is related to ACPI, because there are no CPU or fan data in /proc/acpi.
[ukiewel@asus ~]$ ll /proc/acpi total 0 dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Feb 17 22:23 button - -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 17 22:23 wakeup
Using acpitools, my Asus Ultrabook is not recognised as Asus:
[ukiewel@asus ~]$ acpitool -A Sorry, but no Asus ACPI extensions were found on this system.
The other informations provided by acpi tool are also wrong:
[ukiewel@asus ~]$ acpitool Battery is not present, bailing out. AC adapter : <info not available> Thermal info : <not available>
While typing this mail, the Ultrabook runs on battery.
Here some details from dmesg: [ukiewel@asus ~]$ dmesg | grep -i asus DMI: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. UX32VDA/UX32VDA, BIOS UX32VDA.202 09/10/2012 ACPI: RSDP 00000000ca84d000 00024 (v02 _ASUS_) ACPI: XSDT 00000000ca84d090 000AC (v01 _ASUS_ Notebook 01072009 AMI 00010013) ACPI: FACP 00000000ca861268 0010C (v05 _ASUS_ Notebook 01072009 AMI 00010013) ACPI: DSDT 00000000ca84d1d0 14098 (v02 _ASUS_ Notebook 00000013 INTL 20091112) ACPI: APIC 00000000ca861378 00072 (v03 _ASUS_ Notebook 01072009 AMI 00010013) ACPI: FPDT 00000000ca8613f0 00044 (v01 _ASUS_ Notebook 01072009 AMI 00010013) ACPI: ECDT 00000000ca861438 000C1 (v01 _ASUS_ Notebook 01072009 AMI. 00000005) ACPI: MCFG 00000000ca861500 0003C (v01 _ASUS_ Notebook 01072009 MSFT 00000097) ACPI: HPET 00000000ca8635e0 00038 (v01 _ASUS_ Notebook 01072009 AMI. 00000005) ACPI: BGRT 00000000ca865478 00038 (v00 _ASUS_ Notebook 01072009 ASUS 00010013) ACPI: MSDM 00000000ca5fee18 00055 (v03 _ASUS_ Notebook 00000000 ASUS 00000001)
Any idea how to fix it?
Thanks Uwe
Hi Uwe,
It sounds like a bug. I'm not really sure how you'd fix it. If you file a bug, the maintainer may have some insights or workarounds.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/2013 02:07 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi Uwe,
It sounds like a bug. I'm not really sure how you'd fix it. If you file a bug, the maintainer may have some insights or workarounds.
I got help on the list of Fedora Power Management Special Interest Group. Please look there in their archive.
Thanks Uwe
laptop@lists.fedoraproject.org