On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 13:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/16/2009 08:15 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Yes, I do understand that part. :) I was simply correcting the point
> that the MS Shared Source License was in any way acceptable for Fedora
> (it is not).
> The MS Public License is acceptable for Fedora, Free but GPL
> incompatible. I'm adding it to the table now.
Can you let me know why it is GPL incompatible?
IANAL, but perhaps: