On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 23:03 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > >>>>> "TC" == Tom \"spot\" Callaway <Tom> writes:
> > TC> Given that it does not give permission for us to redistribute (the
> > TC> cornerstone requirement for Content licenses), this license is not
> > TC> acceptable for Fedora.
> > I guess I'm glad I looked before approving the package, but I have to
> > wonder: Do the cacert folks actually want anyone to use their
> > certificates? I mean, this prevents basically everyone from using
> > them, because they can't come with the OS or the browser.
> Personally, the more I read the document, the more I'm confused.
> "You may NOT distribute certificates or root keys under this
> licence"... does this mean we can distribute under a different license?
Well, sortof. The wording here is strange because you can get a
different license from the CA issuer. We can't just pick a license, but
the CA issuer might be willing to give us a different one.
> Would it be worth getting in contact with CAcert.org in order to try
> and have them allow us to redistribute the root certs under conditions
> which are acceptable to the Fedora Project?
Probably, yes. :)
I noticed there is a website called usefedora.com that sells a product to
make online schools. Is this a violation of any trademark that redhat might
hold with regards to the Fedora name?
the Copr Build Service  got a logo some time ago and I would like to
protect it somehow. I'm thinking about making it an unregistered trademark
(TM) and creating some usage guidelines. The main goal of the guidelines
would be a way for people to promote our project. The guidelines would look
similar to these: https://www.docker.com/brand-guidelines
As the trademark needs to belong to someone, I would like to "give" the
logo to Red Hat and state something like "this logo is a trademark of Red
I haven't done anything like this before. What is the right way of
Associate Software Engineer
I'm reviewing perl-Net-HL7 and I'm unsure about its Beerware
license. Although our guidelines generally classify Beerware as
`free', the drink is mandatory in this variant:
Version 666, July 2012
You can use this stuff and do whatever you like with it on the
0. Would you ever be in a situation where you are able to offer
us, or one of us, a beer, or if unavailable, an alcoholic
beverage of your choice, you must do so.
Wyldebeast & Wunderliebe
Am I correct in assuming this license is non-free and
winetricks  is free software, but I was originally under the
impression that it was ineligible for inclusion in Fedora because it
is used primarily to download and install non-free software. (That is
not it's only function, though--it also does some registry hacks and
can manage multiple WINEPREFIXes.)
However, some members of the community disagree  and say that it
might be eligible for Fedora, so we'd like confirmation one way or the