On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:31 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@redhat.com> wrote:
> Let me check with some folks on that. I'd be interested in others'
> opinions, too.
>
> If it were a code license, that's an obvious field of use restriction,
> which means we wouldn't accept it. Historically, we've permitted
> non-modification content licenses. Given the relatively narrow
> restriction here, I'm inclined to except it, too. After all, we *use*
> Unsplash photos around the project all the time: in Fedora Magazine,
> on the Flock website, etc.
Yeah, I know that pictures from unsplash.com are used in tons of
places, but this is the first case I encountered where pictures that
are licensed with their new custom license terms would end up an
actual package - so I figured I should ask here first ... especially
given the usage restrictions (though I don't think that it would apply
to our use case, but obviously IANAL).
Fabio
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure