[Fedora-legal-list] ttf2pt1 license

[Göran Uddeborg]

I'm learning how to package RPM:s according to the Fedora rules, and
have come to the license.  My first package, ttf2pt1, has a home-brewn
variant of the BSD license, which I attach.

A few individual files in the package have different licenses.  In
some case it's GPLv2+ licensed, but some scripts have a separate short
license which I also attach.

I understand that I should ask here if 1) it is ok to package this
program, and 2) what to use in the License tag value.


#  Copyright (c) 1998, 1999
#   Sergey A. Babkin.  All rights reserved.
# 
#  Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
#  modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
#  are met:
#  1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
#     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
#  2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
#     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
#     documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
# 
#  THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
#  WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
#  MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
# 
#  Sergey A. Babkin (sab123(a)hotmail.com, babkin(a)bellatlantic.net)