I'm learning how to package RPM:s according to the Fedora rules, and
have come to the license. My first package, ttf2pt1, has a home-brewn
variant of the BSD license, which I attach.
A few individual files in the package have different licenses. In
some case it's GPLv2+ licensed, but some scripts have a separate short
license which I also attach.
I understand that I should ask here if 1) it is ok to package this
program, and 2) what to use in the License tag value.
# Copyright (c) 1998, 1999
# Sergey A. Babkin. All rights reserved.
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
# are met:
# 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
# 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
# documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
# WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
# MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
# Sergey A. Babkin (sab123(a)hotmail.com, babkin(a)bellatlantic.net)