On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:44:10AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:37 AM Florian Weimer
<fweimer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Just to be clear: These changes are the result of the changes to the
> actual license text, and the previous license is still acceptable to
> Fedora? (It would theoretically be possible that as part of the review,
> it became clear that upstream's and Fedora's interpretation of the
> previous license terms had been different, and upstream's interpretation
> is incompatible with Fedora's requirements.)
>
Good question. Yes, the previous license (used with Nmap < 7.90) is
still considered acceptable for Fedora.
And an update to:
https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect-data-fedora/blob/master/licenses...
?
There is currently only this entry:
"Nmap License": {
"approved": "yes",
"fedora_abbrev": "Nmap",
"fedora_name": "Nmap License",
"id": "365",
"license_text": "",
"spdx_abbrev": "",
"spdx_name": "",
"url": "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Nmap"
},
Thanks,
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell(a)redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT