Re: [Fedora-legal-list] a derivative of the Linux Documentation Project License

[Björn Persson]

Björn Persson wrote:
>  The MySQL++ User Manual has another license than the library itself,
>  but the -manuals subpackage inherits its License field from the main
>  package. This shall be fixed, but it's not obvious what the license of
>  the manual should be called. It's described as follows:
>  
>  | The MySQL++ User Manual is licensed under a unique license derived from
>  | the Linux Documentation Project License. (The only changes are due to
>  | the fact that the User Manual isn't actually part of the LDP, so a lot
>  | of the language in the LDPL doesn't make sense when applied to the user
>  | manual.)
>  
>  The license text is included below. Shall I call this license "LDPL",
>  or does it need a name of its own? 
I went ahead and called it "LDPL".

Björn Persson