On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:31 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Let me check with some folks on that. I'd be interested in
others'
opinions, too.
If it were a code license, that's an obvious field of use restriction,
which means we wouldn't accept it. Historically, we've permitted
non-modification content licenses. Given the relatively narrow
restriction here, I'm inclined to except it, too. After all, we *use*
Unsplash photos around the project all the time: in Fedora Magazine,
on the Flock website, etc.
Yeah, I know that pictures from
unsplash.com are used in tons of
places, but this is the first case I encountered where pictures that
are licensed with their new custom license terms would end up an
actual package - so I figured I should ask here first ... especially
given the usage restrictions (though I don't think that it would apply
to our use case, but obviously IANAL).
Fabio